Information provision and attentive listening as determinants of patient perceptions of shared decision-making around chronic illnesses

被引:9
|
作者
del Rio-Lanza, Ana-Belen [1 ,2 ]
Suarez-Alvarez, Leticia [1 ]
Suarez-Vazquez, Ana [1 ]
Vazquez-Casielles, Rodolfo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oviedo, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Business Adm, Biomed & Hlth Cluster, Ave Cristo S-N, Oviedo 33071, Asturias, Spain
[2] Spanish Federat Haemophilia, Madrid, Spain
来源
SPRINGERPLUS | 2016年 / 5卷
关键词
Decision making; Patients perspective; Self efficacy; Proactive behaviour; Chronic disease; Patient-centered care; Physician-patient relations; Communication programs; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BREAST-CANCER; SELF-EFFICACY; SCALE DEVELOPMENT; HEALTH; CARE; COMMUNICATION; PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1186/s40064-016-3086-4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: While chronic illnesses are a major concern of the health system worldwide, little is known about patients-physicians communication. Growing demand for patient-centered care and shared decision-making have increased the interest for patients-physicians communication. Based on previous literature, we propose a model in which the effect of information provision and attentive listening over patients' perceptions of shared decision-making (PPSDM) is mediated by the variables self-efficacy and proactivity. Primary data were collected between April and August 2014 through an online survey of patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia is a chronic disease in which many options of treatment are available. The right option depends, to some extent, on patient's preferences. In this context, great uncertainty exists when choosing treatment option and shared decision-making plays an essential role. Results: A total of 181 patients with haemophilia participated in the survey. The psychometric properties of the measurement scales were evaluated by means of a confirmatory factor analysis. A structural equation model was designed. Results show that provision of information and attentive listening determine PPSDM through patients' self-efficacy and proactivity in requesting information. Conclusions: It is important to incorporate communication training in medical education, particularly provision of information and attentive listening. These skills help the healthcare professional to gain a deeper understanding of the patient. Furthermore, provision of information and attentive listening are fundamental in helping patients not to undervalue their personal knowledge and expertise in relation to their doctors. These strategies encourage them to adopt a more active position in requesting information. Encouraging a proactive behaviour of patients and their relatives helps them to realize the need to participate and to make them feel that they are part of the decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integrating patient perspectives in medical decision-making: a qualitative interview study examining potentials within the rare disease information exchange process in practice
    Babac, Ana
    von Friedrichs, Verena
    Litzkendorf, Svenja
    Zeidler, Jan
    Damm, Kathrin
    von der Schulenburg, J. -Matthias Graf
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [42] The Psychometric Properties of CollaboRATE: A Fast and Frugal Patient-Reported Measure of the Shared Decision-Making Process
    Barr, Paul James
    Thompson, Rachel
    Walsh, Thom
    Grande, Stuart W.
    Ozanne, Elissa M.
    Elwyn, Glyn
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (01)
  • [43] Enhancing Doctor-Patient Shared Decision-Making: Design of a Novel Collaborative Decision Description Language
    Guo, Xiaorui
    Xiao, Liang
    Liu, Xinyu
    Chen, Jianxia
    Tong, Zefang
    Liu, Ziji
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [44] How shared is decision-making in multidisciplinary tumour conferences with patient participation? An observational study
    Schellenberger, Barbara
    Heuser, Christian
    Diekmann, Annika
    Ernstmann, Nicole
    Schippers, Anna
    Geiser, Franziska
    Schmidt-Wolf, Ingo G. H.
    Scholl, Isabelle
    Ansmann, Lena
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2022, 25 (06) : 3297 - 3306
  • [45] Systematic review of shared decision-making interventions for people living with chronic respiratory diseases
    Barradell, Amy C.
    Gerlis, Charlotte
    Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
    Bekker, Hilary L.
    Robertson, Noelle
    Singh, Sally J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [46] Correlation analysis between physicians' evaluations of doctor-patient relationship and their preferences for shared decision-making in China
    Chen, Zhuo-Ran
    Zhang, Li
    Chen, Ya-Wei
    Xu, Meng-Yang
    Jia, Hang
    Li, Meng-Ying
    Lou, Yu-Han
    Lan, Ling
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [47] Minority patient preferences, barriers, and facilitators for shared decision-making with health care providers in the USA: A systematic review
    Jolles, Monica Perez
    Richmond, Jennifer
    Thomas, Kathleen C.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (07) : 1251 - 1262
  • [48] Shared decision-making in atrial fibrillation: patient-reported involvement in treatment decisions
    Ali-Ahmed, Fatima
    Pieper, Karen
    North, Rebecca
    Allen, Larry A.
    Chan, Paul S.
    Ezekowitz, Michael D.
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    Freeman, James, V
    Go, Alan S.
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    Kowey, Peter R.
    Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
    Naccarelli, Gerald, V
    Pokorney, Sean D.
    Reiffel, James A.
    Singer, Daniel E.
    Steinberg, Benjamin A.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Piccini, Jonathan P.
    O'Brien, Emily C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2020, 6 (04) : 263 - 272
  • [49] Patient autonomy and shared decision-making in the context of clinical trial participation
    Dennstaedt, Fabio
    Putora, Paul Martin
    Iseli, Thomas
    Treffers, Theresa
    Panje, Cedric
    Fischer, Galina Farina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2024, 54 (11)
  • [50] Patient Recommendations for Shared Decision-Making in Uterine Fibroid Treatment Decisions
    Riggan, Kirsten A.
    Stewart, Elizabeth A.
    Balls-Berry, Joyce E.
    Venable, Sateria
    Allyse, Megan A.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2021, 8