Discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection in gastric epithelial neoplasia

被引:71
作者
Lim, Hyun [1 ]
Jung, Hwoon-Yong [1 ]
Park, Young Soo [2 ]
Na, Hee Kyong [1 ]
Ahn, Ji Yong [1 ]
Choi, Ji Young [1 ]
Lee, Jeong Hoon [1 ]
Kim, Mi-Young [1 ]
Choi, Kwi-Sook [1 ]
Kim, Do Hoon [1 ]
Choi, Kee Don [1 ]
Song, Ho June [1 ]
Lee, Gin Hyug [1 ]
Kim, Jin-Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol,Asan Digest Dis Res Inst, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Pathol,Asan Digest Dis Res Inst, Seoul 138736, South Korea
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2014年 / 28卷 / 04期
关键词
Endoscopic forceps biopsy; Endoscopic resection; Gastric epithelial neoplasia; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; MUCOSAL RESECTION; DYSPLASIA; CANCER; POLYPS; CLASSIFICATION; TRANSFORMATION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-013-3316-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) is a major diagnostic procedure for gastric epithelial neoplasia (GEN). However, discrepancy between the result of EFB and endoscopic resection (ER) is not uncommon. Thus, there is controversy over whether specimens obtained by EFB are optimal for diagnosis of GEN. We investigated the discrepancy between EFB and ER in the diagnosis of GEN. A total of 1,850 GEN cases were histologically diagnosed with EFB, including 954 low-grade dysplasias (LGDs), 315 high-grade dysplasias (HGDs), and 581 carcinomas. Following diagnosis with EFB, all patients were treated with ER. We retrospectively reviewed the pathologic findings and patient characteristics and analyzed predictors for the discrepancy between the two procedures (largest diameter, number of biopsy fragments, number of biopsy fragments/largest diameter, location, macroscopic type, color, surface unevenness, and erosion). The overall discrepancy rate between EFB and ER was 31.7 % (587/1,850). Among the discordant group, 440 (23.9 %) cases showed a higher grade of disease after ER; 229 of the 954 LGDs (24.0 %) were diagnosed as HGD or carcinoma, 166 of the 315 HGDs (52.7 %) as carcinoma, and 45 of the 581 differentiated carcinomas (7.7 %) as undifferentiated carcinoma. In the LGD group with EFB, the largest diameter (a parts per thousand yen1.8 cm; P < 0.001), surface unevenness (P = 0.014), and depressed macroscopic type (P < 0.001) were factors associated with discrepancy. In the carcinoma group with EFB, flat macroscopic type (P = 0.043) was the only significant factor. In the HGD group with EFB, there were no significant factors for discrepancy. EFB can be insufficient for diagnosing GENs, and ER can be considered not only as treatment but also as a diagnostic modality in GEN. It is especially pertinent to all cases of HGD regardless of their endoscopic features and to cases of LGDs with the largest lesion diameter a parts per thousand yen1.8 cm, surface unevenness, or a depressed macroscopic type.
引用
收藏
页码:1256 / 1262
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Endoscopic characteristics in predicting prognosis of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
    Zou, Long
    Jiang, Qingwei
    Guo, Tao
    Wu, Xi
    Wang, Qiang
    Feng, Yunlu
    Zhang, Shengyu
    Fang, Weigang
    Zhou, Weixun
    Yang, Aiming
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 135 (01) : 26 - 35
  • [42] Clinicopathologic factors and outcomes of histologic discrepancy between differentiated and undifferentiated types after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer
    Shim, Choong Nam
    Kim, Hyunki
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Chung, Hyun Soo
    Park, Jun Chul
    Lee, Hyuk
    Shin, Sung Kwan
    Lee, Sang Kil
    Lee, Yong Chan
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (07): : 2097 - 2105
  • [43] Efficacy and safety of grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: A multi-centre retrospective study
    Ichijima, Ryoji
    Suzuki, Sho
    Esaki, Mitsuru
    Horii, Toshiki
    Kusano, Chika
    Ikehara, Hisatomo
    Gotoda, Takuji
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 13 (03) : 174 - 184
  • [44] Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens
    Yang, Lang
    Jin, Hua
    Xie, Xiao-li
    Cao, Yang-tian
    Liu, Zhen-hua
    Li, Na
    Jin, Peng
    He, Yu-qi
    Sheng, Jian-qiu
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [46] NOVEL TECHNIQUE OF ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION USING AN EXTERNAL GRASPING FORCEPS FOR SUPERFICIAL GASTRIC NEOPLASIA
    Imaeda, Hiroyuki
    Hosoe, Naoki
    Ida, Yosuke
    Kashiwagi, Kazuhiro
    Morohoshi, Yuichi
    Suganuma, Kazuhiro
    Nagakubo, Shuichi
    Komatsu, Koichi
    Suzuki, Hidekazu
    Saito, Yoshimasa
    Aiura, Koichi
    Ogata, Haruhiko
    Iwao, Yasushi
    Kumai, Koichiro
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    Hibi, Toshifumi
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 21 (02) : 122 - 127
  • [47] Endoscopic features suggesting gastric cancer in biopsy-proven gastric adenoma with high-grade neoplasia
    Kim, Jung Ho
    Kim, Yoon Jae
    An, Jungsuk
    Lee, Jong Joon
    Cho, Jae Hee
    Kim, Kyoung Oh
    Chung, Jun-Won
    Kwon, Kwang An
    Park, Dong Kyun
    Kim, Ju Hyun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (34) : 12233 - 12240
  • [48] The optimal interval of surveillance gastroscopy after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia: a multicenter cohort study
    Choe, Younghee
    Kim, Byung-Wook
    Kim, Tae Ho
    Chung, Jun-Won
    Kim, Jongwon
    Na, Soo-Young
    Kim, Joon Sung
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (10): : 7556 - 7562
  • [49] Negative pathology after endoscopic resection of gastric epithelial neoplasms: importance of pit dysplasia
    Jhi, Joon Hyung
    Kim, Gwang Ha
    Kim, Ahrong
    Kim, Young-Geum
    Hwang, Cheong Su
    Lee, Sojeong
    Lee, Bong Eun
    Song, Geun Am
    Park, Do Youn
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 32 (04) : 647 - 655
  • [50] Final outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasia
    Choi, Cheol Woong
    Kang, Dae Hwan
    Kim, Hyung Wook
    Park, Su Bum
    Kim, Su Jin
    Nam, Hyeong Seok
    Ryu, Dae Gon
    Kwon, Byung Jin
    Yu, Jin Seok
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 : 371 - 371