Discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection in gastric epithelial neoplasia

被引:71
作者
Lim, Hyun [1 ]
Jung, Hwoon-Yong [1 ]
Park, Young Soo [2 ]
Na, Hee Kyong [1 ]
Ahn, Ji Yong [1 ]
Choi, Ji Young [1 ]
Lee, Jeong Hoon [1 ]
Kim, Mi-Young [1 ]
Choi, Kwi-Sook [1 ]
Kim, Do Hoon [1 ]
Choi, Kee Don [1 ]
Song, Ho June [1 ]
Lee, Gin Hyug [1 ]
Kim, Jin-Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol,Asan Digest Dis Res Inst, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Pathol,Asan Digest Dis Res Inst, Seoul 138736, South Korea
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2014年 / 28卷 / 04期
关键词
Endoscopic forceps biopsy; Endoscopic resection; Gastric epithelial neoplasia; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; MUCOSAL RESECTION; DYSPLASIA; CANCER; POLYPS; CLASSIFICATION; TRANSFORMATION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-013-3316-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) is a major diagnostic procedure for gastric epithelial neoplasia (GEN). However, discrepancy between the result of EFB and endoscopic resection (ER) is not uncommon. Thus, there is controversy over whether specimens obtained by EFB are optimal for diagnosis of GEN. We investigated the discrepancy between EFB and ER in the diagnosis of GEN. A total of 1,850 GEN cases were histologically diagnosed with EFB, including 954 low-grade dysplasias (LGDs), 315 high-grade dysplasias (HGDs), and 581 carcinomas. Following diagnosis with EFB, all patients were treated with ER. We retrospectively reviewed the pathologic findings and patient characteristics and analyzed predictors for the discrepancy between the two procedures (largest diameter, number of biopsy fragments, number of biopsy fragments/largest diameter, location, macroscopic type, color, surface unevenness, and erosion). The overall discrepancy rate between EFB and ER was 31.7 % (587/1,850). Among the discordant group, 440 (23.9 %) cases showed a higher grade of disease after ER; 229 of the 954 LGDs (24.0 %) were diagnosed as HGD or carcinoma, 166 of the 315 HGDs (52.7 %) as carcinoma, and 45 of the 581 differentiated carcinomas (7.7 %) as undifferentiated carcinoma. In the LGD group with EFB, the largest diameter (a parts per thousand yen1.8 cm; P < 0.001), surface unevenness (P = 0.014), and depressed macroscopic type (P < 0.001) were factors associated with discrepancy. In the carcinoma group with EFB, flat macroscopic type (P = 0.043) was the only significant factor. In the HGD group with EFB, there were no significant factors for discrepancy. EFB can be insufficient for diagnosing GENs, and ER can be considered not only as treatment but also as a diagnostic modality in GEN. It is especially pertinent to all cases of HGD regardless of their endoscopic features and to cases of LGDs with the largest lesion diameter a parts per thousand yen1.8 cm, surface unevenness, or a depressed macroscopic type.
引用
收藏
页码:1256 / 1262
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endoscopic Resection for Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer: Focusing on Histologic Discrepancies Between Forceps Biopsy-Based and Endoscopic Resection Specimen-Based Diagnosis
    Byung-Hoon Min
    Ki Joo Kang
    Jun Haeng Lee
    Eun Ran Kim
    Yang Won Min
    Poong-Lyul Rhee
    Jae J. Kim
    Jong Chul Rhee
    Kyoung-Mee Kim
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2014, 59 : 2536 - 2543
  • [22] Retrospective study The diagnostic accuracy of conventional forceps biopsy of gastric epithelial compared to endoscopic submucosal dissection (STROBE compliant)
    Lu, Chao
    Lv, Xueyou
    Lin, Yiming
    Li, Dejian
    Chen, Lihua
    Ji, Feng
    Li, Youming
    Yu, Chaohui
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (30)
  • [23] Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of epithelial neoplasia of the colon
    Kaimakliotis, Pavlos Z.
    Chandrasekhara, Vinay
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 8 (05) : 521 - 531
  • [24] Pathologic Validation of Endoscopic Ablative Therapy for Gastric Epithelial Neoplasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Huh, Cheal Wung
    Kim, Jiyoung
    Kim, Byung-Wook
    Kim, Joon Sung
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 32 (12) : 1029 - 1037
  • [25] Grasper type scissors for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric epithelial neoplasia
    Chung, Woo-Chul
    Kim, Byung-Wook
    Lim, Chul-Hyun
    Kim, Tae-Ho
    Park, Jae-Myung
    Kim, Joon-Sung
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (37) : 6221 - 6227
  • [26] Endoscopic resection of early oesophageal and gastric neoplasia
    Pouw, Roos E.
    Bergman, Jacques J. G. H. M.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 22 (05) : 929 - 943
  • [27] The long-term outcome and risk factors of histologic discrepancy between forceps biopsies and endoscopic resections in early gastric cancer: An observational study
    Yeo, Min-Kyung
    Park, Jae Ho
    Kang, Sun Hyung
    Moon, Hee Seok
    Sung, Jae Kyu
    Jeong, Hyun Yong
    Kim, Ju Seok
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (23) : e38451
  • [28] What is the next step for gastric atypical epithelium on histological findings of endoscopic forceps biopsy?
    Kim, So-I
    Han, Hye Seung
    Kim, Jeong Hwan
    Lee, Kyung-Ju
    Hong, Sung Noh
    Lee, Sun-Young
    Kim, Heung Up
    Sung, Tae Sik
    Zheng, Heifeng
    Sung, In-Kyung
    Park, Hyung Seok
    Shim, Chan Sup
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2013, 45 (07) : 573 - 577
  • [29] Size discrepancy between endoscopic size and pathologic size is not negligible in endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer
    Choong Nam Shim
    Mi Kyung Song
    Dae Ryong Kang
    Hyun Soo Chung
    Jun Chul Park
    Hyuk Lee
    Sung Kwan Shin
    Sang Kil Lee
    Yong Chan Lee
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 2199 - 2207
  • [30] Endoscopic resection for superficial colorectal neoplasia in Italy: A prospective multicentre study
    Cipolletta, Livio
    Rotondano, Gianluca
    Bianco, Maria A.
    Buffoli, Federico
    Gizzi, Giuseppe
    Tessari, Francesco
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2014, 46 (02) : 146 - 151