Integrity of Implant Surface Modifications After Insertion

被引:33
|
作者
Mints, Daniel [1 ]
Elias, Carlos [2 ]
Funkenbusch, Paul [3 ]
Meirelles, Luiz [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Eastman Dent Ctr, Dept Biomed Engn, Div Prosthodont, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
[2] Inst Mil Engn, Dept Biomat, Biomat Lab, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Rochester, Hajim Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Mech Engn, Rochester, NY USA
[4] Univ Rochester, Eastman Inst Oral Hlth, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
dental implants; osteolysis; surface characterization; surface roughness; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; BONE; PARTICLES; ROUGHNESS; REMOVAL; TORQUE;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.3259
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The surface integrity associated with implant placement was examined to determine whether the topography of common implant surface modifications is retained after implant insertion. Materials and Methods: Turned (TV), acid-etched (AE), and anodized (AN) experimental implants prepared in-house were inserted into polyurethane foam blocks using a standard drilling protocol at maximum torque of 37 Ncm. Qualitative analysis of the surfaces of preinserted and postinserted implants was done by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and quantitative analysis of the implant threads was performed by interferometry. Among the roughness parameters calculated were average height deviation (Sa), peak height above core roughness (Spk), and maximum peak height (Sp). Results: SEM showed that TV implants exhibited similar morphology before and after implant insertion. The AE implants showed reduced peak height associated with flattened areas after insertion. AN implants demonstrated the most extensive damage associated with insertion; the entire porous oxide layer had been removed at the apical region and on the crests of the threads. Surface roughness evaluation was corroborated with the SEM findings. Roughness parameters were similar for TV implants, and reduced Sp and Spk values were observed for the AE implants after insertion. AN implants were more complex to measure quantitatively because of variations in the extent of damage to the oxide layer during insertion. In some cases, the AN layer had been completely removed, exposing the underlying material and clearly decreasing the roughness, and in other cases it remained intact and rough. Polyurethane foam blocks in contact with AN implants demonstrated loose titanium particles of different sizes. Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrated surface damage after insertion of experimental anodized implants into polyurethane blocks associated with loose titanium particles at the interface. Future in vivo studies should investigate the relevance of such loose particles on the peri-implant bone response.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of Insertion Torque and Implant Neck Design on Peri-Implant Bone Level: A Randomized Split-Mouth Trial
    Hof, Markus
    Pommer, Bernhard
    Strbac, Georg D.
    Vasak, Christoph
    Agis, Hermann
    Zechner, Werner
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (05) : 668 - 674
  • [32] Comparison of two dental implant surface modifications on implants with same macrodesign: an experimental study in the pelvic sheep model
    Ernst, Sabrina
    Stuebinger, Stefan
    Schuepbach, Peter
    Sidler, Michele
    Klein, Karina
    Ferguson, Stephen J.
    von Rechenberg, Brigitte
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (08) : 898 - 908
  • [33] Implant surface modifications and their impact on osseointegration and peri-implant diseases through epigenetic changes: A scoping review
    Kunrath, Marcel F.
    Garaicoa-Pazmino, Carlos
    Giraldo-Osorno, Paula Milena
    Haj Mustafa, Aya
    Dahlin, Christer
    Larsson, Lena
    Asa'ad, Farah
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 59 (06) : 1095 - 1114
  • [34] Implant Surface Morphology and Primary Stability: Is There a Connection?
    Javed, Fawad
    Almas, Khalid
    Crespi, Roberto
    Romanos, George E.
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2011, 20 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [35] Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition
    Isabel Nicolas-Silvente, Ana
    Velasco-Ortega, Eugenio
    Ortiz-Garcia, Ivan
    Monsalve-Guil, Loreto
    Gil, Javier
    Jimenez-Guerra, Alvaro
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (02)
  • [36] Evaluation of the impact of different surface treatments on implant surface: An In Vitro study
    Jalaluddin, Mohammad
    Subramanian, Deepa
    Mathew, Joel
    Mailankote, Shilpa
    Almuraikhi, Turki
    Daghriri, Alhussain
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : 1132 - 1135
  • [37] The influence of surface treatment on the implant roughness pattern
    Rosa, Marcio Borges
    Albrektsson, Tomas
    Francischone, Carlos Eduardo
    Schwartz Filho, Humberto Osvaldo
    Wennerberg, Ann
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2012, 20 (05) : 550 - 555
  • [38] Nanometrical evaluation of direct laser implant surface
    Ricci, M.
    Mangano, F.
    Tercio, T.
    Tonelli, P.
    Barone, A.
    Raspanti, M.
    Covani, U.
    SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS, 2012, 44 (13) : 1582 - 1586
  • [39] Effect of insertion factors on dental implant insertion torque/energy-experimental results
    Yang, Baixuan
    Irastorza-Landa, Ainara
    Heuberger, Peter
    Ploeg, Heidi-Lynn
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2020, 112
  • [40] The relationship between implant stability quotient values and implant insertion variables: a clinical study
    Park, K-J
    Kwon, J-Y
    Kim, S-K
    Heo, S-J
    Koak, J-Y
    Lee, J-H
    Lee, S-J
    Kim, T-H
    Kim, M-J
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 39 (02) : 151 - 159