Periapical Inflammation Subsequent to Coronal Inoculation of Dog Teeth Root Filled with Resilon/Epiphany in 1 or 2 Treatment Sessions with Chlorhexidine Medication

被引:28
|
作者
Santos, Joao M. [1 ]
Palma, Paulo J. [1 ]
Ramos, Joao C. [1 ]
Cabrita, Antonio S. [2 ]
Friedman, Shimon [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Fac Med, Dept Dent, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Fac Med, Inst Expt Pathol, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Discipline Endodont, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
1-session treatment; chlorhexidine; coronal leakage; Resilon; root canal filling; CANAL-FILLING MATERIAL; GUTTA-PERCHA/AH PLUS; IN-VITRO; DENTIN; LEAKAGE; SEALER; VIVO; SUSCEPTIBILITY; SUBSTANTIVITY; DEGRADATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.023
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: Therapeutic methods that inhibit microbial ingress into filled root canals are desirable. This in vivo study assessed the inhibition of periapical inflammation subsequent to coronal inoculation in canals medicated with 2% chlorhexidine gel and filled with Resilon/Epiphany (Pentron Clinical Technologies, Wallingford, CT). Methods: Six Beagle dogs each had 10 two-rooted premolars treated. In group 1 (n = 36 roots), 1 root/tooth had the canal conditioned with Primer Epiphany, filled with Epiphany sealer and Resilon core in 1 session, and coronally sealed with PhotacFil. In group 2 (n = 36 roots), the second root/tooth had the canal medicated with 2% chlorhexidine gel for 1 week and then filled and coronally sealed as in group 1. After 3 weeks, canals were exposed to the oral environment for 7 days, inoculated with isologous plaque, and coronally sealed. Negative controls treated as groups 1 and 2 remained sealed. Positive controls had canals unfilled and exposed. Seven months after inoculation, dogs were euthanized; jaw blocks processed for histologic examination; and periapical inflammation (PI) recorded as none, mild, or severe. Results: In groups 1 and 2, severe PI occurred in 5 of 65 roots (8%) and mild PI in 18 of 65 roots (28%) with a significantly higher (P = .031) PI incidence in group 2 than in group 1. Negative controls had only mild PI in 9 of 29 roots (31%). Roots medicated with 2% chlorhexidine gel had mild PI significantly more (P = .009) than roots filled in 1 session (more than 2-fold). Conclusions: Intracanal medication with 2% chlorhexidine gel and root filling with Resilon/Epiphany did not effectively inhibit apical periodontitis subsequent to coronal inoculation.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 841
页数:5
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Periapical Inflammation and Bacterial Penetration After Coronal Inoculation of Dog Roots Filled With RealSeal 1 or Thermafil
    Duggan, Derek
    Arnold, Roland R.
    Teixeira, Fabricio B.
    Caplan, Daniel J.
    Tawil, Peter
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2009, 35 (06) : 852 - 857