An efficient optimization approach for a cardinality-constrained index tracking problem

被引:43
|
作者
Xu, Fengmin [1 ]
Lu, Zhaosong [2 ]
Xu, Zongben [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Math, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
来源
OPTIMIZATION METHODS & SOFTWARE | 2016年 / 31卷 / 02期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
index tracking; cardinality constraint; nonmonotone projected gradient method; PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION; ERROR; MINIMIZATION; SPARSE;
D O I
10.1080/10556788.2015.1062891
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In the practical business environment, portfolio managers often face business-driven requirements that limit the number of constituents in their tracking portfolio. A natural index tracking model is thus to minimize a tracking error measure while enforcing an upper bound on the number of assets in the portfolio. In this paper we consider such a cardinality-constrained index tracking model. In particular, we propose an efficient nonmonotone projected gradient (NPG) method for solving this problem. At each iteration, this method usually solves several projected gradient subproblems. We show that each subproblem has a closed-form solution, which can be computed in linear time. Under some suitable assumptions, we establish that any accumulation point of the sequence generated by the NPG method is a local minimizer of the cardinality-constrained index tracking problem. We also conduct empirical tests to compare our method with the hybrid evolutionary algorithm [P.R. Torrubiano and S. Alberto. A hybrid optimization approach to index tracking. Ann Oper Res. 166(1) (2009), pp. 57-71] and the hybrid half thresholding algorithm [F. Xu, Z. Xu and H Xue. Sparse index tracking: an L-1/2 regularization based model and solution, Submitted, 2012] for index tracking. The computational results demonstrate that our approach generally produces sparse portfolios with smaller out-of-sample tracking error and higher consistency between in-sample and out-of-sample tracking errors. Moreover, our method outperforms the other two approaches in terms of speed.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 271
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Relaxed Optimization Approach for Cardinality-Constrained Portfolios
    Zhang, Jize
    Leung, Tim
    Aravkin, Aleksandr
    2019 18TH EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), 2019, : 2885 - 2892
  • [2] A polynomial case of the cardinality-constrained quadratic optimization problem
    Jianjun Gao
    Duan Li
    Journal of Global Optimization, 2013, 56 : 1441 - 1455
  • [3] A polynomial case of the cardinality-constrained quadratic optimization problem
    Gao, Jianjun
    Li, Duan
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 2013, 56 (04) : 1441 - 1455
  • [4] Algorithm for cardinality-constrained quadratic optimization
    Bertsimas, Dimitris
    Shioda, Romy
    COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, 43 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [5] A Cardinality-Constrained Robust Approach for the Ambulance Location and Dispatching Problem
    Nicoletta, Vittorio
    Lanzarone, Ettore
    Belanger, Valerie
    Ruiz, Angel
    HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2017, 210 : 99 - 109
  • [6] Algorithm for cardinality-constrained quadratic optimization
    Dimitris Bertsimas
    Romy Shioda
    Computational Optimization and Applications, 2009, 43 : 1 - 22
  • [7] On a cardinality-constrained transportation problem with market choice
    Walter, Matthias
    Damci-Kurt, Pelin
    Dey, Santanu S.
    Kuecuekyavuz, Simge
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 44 (02) : 170 - 173
  • [8] Cardinality-constrained distributionally robust portfolio optimization
    Kobayashi, Ken
    Takano, Yuichi
    Nakata, Kazuhide
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 309 (03) : 1173 - 1182
  • [9] A penalty decomposition approach for multi-objective cardinality-constrained optimization problems
    Lapucci, Matteo
    OPTIMIZATION METHODS & SOFTWARE, 2022, 37 (06): : 2157 - 2189
  • [10] An Augmented Lagrangian Method for Cardinality-Constrained Optimization Problems
    Christian Kanzow
    Andreas B. Raharja
    Alexandra Schwartz
    Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2021, 189 : 793 - 813