Impact of processing techniques on the glycemic index of rice

被引:28
|
作者
Sivakamasundari, S. K. [1 ]
Priyanga, S. [1 ]
Moses, J. A. [1 ]
Anandharamakrishnan, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Govt India, Computat Modeling & Nanoscale Proc Unit, Indian Inst Food Proc, Technol IIFPT,Minist Food Proc Ind, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Rice; glycemic index; processing; starch; digestion; in vitro; in vivo; AMYLOSE; STARCH;
D O I
10.1080/10408398.2020.1865259
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Rice is an important starchy staple food and generally, rice varieties are known to have a higher glycemic index (GI). Over the years, the significance of GI on human health is being better understood and is known to be associated with several lifestyle disorders. Apart from the intrinsic characteristics of rice, different food processing techniques are known to have implications on the GI of rice. This work details the effect of domestic and industrial-level processing techniques on the GI of rice by providing an understanding of the resulting physicochemical changes. An attempt has been made to relate the process-dependent digestion behavior, which in turn reflects on the GI. The role of food constituents is elaborated and the various in vitro and in vivo approaches that have been used to determine the GI of foods are summarized. Considering the broader perspective, the effect of cooking methods and additives is explained. Given the significance of the cereal grain, this work concludes with the challenges and key thrust areas for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:3323 / 3344
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimization of Processing Condition of Instant Rice to Lower the Glycemic Index
    Ritudomphol, Onvara
    Luangsakul, Naphatrapi
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2019, 84 (01) : 101 - 110
  • [2] Glycemic index of two varieties of pasta and two varieties of rice
    Ridner, Edgardo
    Di Sibio, Antonio
    ARCHIVOS LATINOAMERICANOS DE NUTRICION, 2015, 65 (02) : 79 - 85
  • [3] Low glycemic index rice-a desired trait in starchy staples
    Jukanti, Aravind Kumar
    Pautong, Putlih Adzra
    Liu, Qiaoquan
    Sreenivasulu, Nese
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 106 : 132 - 149
  • [4] Resistant starch could be decisive in determining the glycemic index of rice cultivars
    Kumar, Awadhesh
    Sahoo, Upasana
    Baisakha, Basavdatta
    Okpani, Oko Augustine
    Ngangkham, Umakanta
    Parameswaran, C.
    Basak, Nabaneeta
    Kumar, Gaurav
    Sharma, S. G.
    JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE, 2018, 79 : 348 - 353
  • [5] Glycemic Index and Amylose Content of 25 Japonica Rice Italian Cultivar
    Rondanelli, Mariangela
    Haxhari, Filip
    Gasparri, Clara
    Barrile, Gaetan Claude
    Cavioni, Alessandro
    Guido, Davide
    Mansueto, Francesca
    Zese, Marco
    Mazzola, Giuseppe
    Moroni, Alessia
    Patelli, Zaria
    Peroni, Gabriella
    Pirola, Martina
    Tartara, Alice
    Cantaluppi, Enrico
    Campanini, Luigi
    Magnani, Edoardo
    Feccia, Sergio
    Perna, Simone
    STARCH-STARKE, 2023, 75 (9-10):
  • [6] RICE - A HIGH OR LOW GLYCEMIC INDEX FOOD
    MILLER, JB
    PANG, E
    BRAMALL, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1992, 56 (06): : 1034 - 1036
  • [7] Glycemic index of American-grown jasmine rice classified as high
    Truong, Teresa H.
    Yuet, Wei Cheng
    Hall, Micki D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCES AND NUTRITION, 2014, 65 (04) : 436 - 439
  • [8] In vitro glycemic profiling of rice: A dual-index approach using predictive glycemic index and inherent glycemic potential
    Salman, C. K. Mohammed
    Bollinedi, Haritha
    Anand, Anjali
    Singh, Archana
    Sundaram, Raman M.
    Prathibha, K.
    Krishnan, Veda
    JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS, 2025, 140
  • [9] Impact of food processing on the glycemic index (GI) of potato products
    Nayak, Balunkeswar
    Berrios, Jose De J.
    Tang, Juming
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 56 : 35 - 46
  • [10] The Glycemic Index of Rice and Rice Products: A Review, and Table of GI Values
    Kaur, Bhupinder
    Ranawana, Viren
    Henry, Jeyakumar
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2016, 56 (02) : 215 - 236