Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies

被引:632
|
作者
Evans, Annette [1 ]
Strezov, Vladimir [1 ]
Evans, Tim J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Grad Sch Environm, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
关键词
Renewable energy; Sustainability; Emissions; Price; Social impacts; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GEOTHERMAL POWER-GENERATION; PAY-BACK TIME; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; NUCLEAR-POWER; GHG EMISSIONS; SOLAR POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The non-combustion based renewable electricity generation technologies were assessed against a range of sustainability indicators and using data obtained from the literature. The indicators used to assess each technology were price of generated electricity, greenhouse gas emissions during full life cycle of the technology, availability of renewable sources, efficiency of energy conversion, land requirements, water consumption and social impacts, The cost of electricity, greenhouse gas emissions and the efficiency of electricity generation were found to have a very wide range for each technology, mainly due to variations in technological options as well as geographical dependence of each renewable energy source. The social impacts were assessed qualitatively based on the major individual impacts discussed in literature. Renewable energy technologies were then ranked against each indicator assuming that indicators have equal importance for sustainable development. It was found that wind power is the most sustainable, followed by hydropower, photovoltaic and then geothermal. Wind power was identified with the lowest relative greenhouse gas emissions, the least water consumption demands and with the most favourable social impacts comparing to other technologies, but requires larger land and has high relative capital costs. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:1082 / 1088
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Threefold sustainability impact assessment method comparison for renewable energy value chains
    Tuomasjukka, Diana
    Athanassiadis, Dimitris
    Vis, Martijn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOREST ENGINEERING, 2017, 28 (02) : 116 - 122
  • [22] Development of Renewable Energy Technologies in rural areas of Pakistan
    Raz, Muhammad Yousaf
    Wasim, Muhammad
    Sarwar, Muhammad Sohail
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2020, 42 (06) : 740 - 760
  • [23] Promoting sustainability of renewable energy technologies and renewable energy service companies in the Fiji Islands
    Chand, Denise
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ENGINEERING AND APPLICATION (ICSEEA) 2012, 2013, 32 : 55 - 63
  • [24] The role of sustainability characteristics in the diffusion of renewable energy technologies
    Aponte, Fabian Rocha
    Wiebe, Kirsten S.
    Luttikhuis, Nikki
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2023, 57
  • [25] A review of key environmental and energy performance indicators for the case of renewable energy systems when integrated with storage solutions
    Kourkoumpas, Dimitrios-Sotirios
    Benekos, Georgios
    Nikolopoulos, Nikolaos
    Karellas, Sotirios
    Grammelis, Panagiotis
    Kakaras, Emmanouel
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 231 : 380 - 398
  • [26] Life cycle assessment of renewable energy technologies in Northern Africa: A critical review
    Hampo, Chima Cyril
    Ojo, Damilola Oluwatobi
    Olatunde, Dare Ebenezer
    Isioma, Obasih Judith
    Oni, Oluwatosin Omolola
    Echendu, Adaku Jane
    Mathew, Musa
    Adediji, Modupeoluwa Abisoluwa
    Oladipo, Seun Festus
    Aro, Peace Oluwatomisin
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2022, 44 (04) : 10248 - 10269
  • [27] Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: Results of a survey among European energy experts
    Carrera, Diana Gallego
    Mack, Alexander
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (02) : 1030 - 1039
  • [28] Life cycle assessment as a decision support tool in wastewater treatment plant design with renewable energy utilization
    Baskurt, Muratcan
    Kocababuc, Ilgin
    Binici, Esra
    Dulekgurgen, Ebru
    Ozgun, Ozlem Karahan
    Tasli, Ruya
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2017, 93 : 229 - 238
  • [29] The effects of non-renewable energy, renewable energy, economic growth, and foreign direct investment on the sustainability of African countries
    Djellouli, Nassima
    Abdelli, Latifa
    Elheddad, Mohamed
    Ahmed, Rizwan
    Mahmood, Haider
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 183 : 676 - 686
  • [30] An environmental assessment of non-renewable, modern renewable, and combustible renewable energy in Cameroon
    Pata, Ugur Korkut
    Karlilar, Selin
    Eweade, Babatunde Sunday
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 27 (03) : 7279 - 7296