Hygiene and Sanitation in Biogas Plants

被引:23
作者
Froeschle, Bianca [1 ]
Heiermann, Monika [2 ]
Lebuhn, Michael [1 ]
Messelhaeusser, Ute [3 ]
Ploechl, Matthias [4 ]
机构
[1] Bavarian State Res Ctr Agr, Dept Qual Assurance & Analyt, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[2] Leibniz Inst Agr Engn Potsdam Bornim, Dept Technol Assessment & Substance Cycles, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
[3] Bavarian Hlth & Food Safety Author, D-85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
[4] BioenergieBeratungBornim GmbH, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
来源
BIOGAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2015年 / 151卷
关键词
MESOPHILIC ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; REAL-TIME PCR; AVIUM SUBSP PARATUBERCULOSIS; WEED SEED SURVIVAL; BOTULINUM TYPE-B; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; CLOSTRIDIUM-BOTULINUM; PATHOGENIC BACTERIA; CRYPTOSPORIDIUM-PARVUM;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-21993-6_3
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The increasing number of agricultural biogas plants and higher amounts of digestate spread on agricultural land arouse a considerable interest in the hygiene situation of digested products. This chapter reviews the current knowledge on sanitation during anaerobic digestion and the hygienic status of digestate concerning a multitude of pathogens potentially compromising the health of humans, animals and plants. Physical, chemical and biological parameters influencing the efficiency of sanitation in anaerobic digestion are considered. The degree of germ reduction depends particularly on the resistance of the pathogen of concern, the processing conditions, the feedstock composition and the diligence of the operation management. Most scientific studies facing sanitation in biogas plants have provided data ascertaining reduction of pathogens by the biogas process. Some pathogens, however, are able to persist virtually unaffected due to the ability to build resistant permanent forms. As compared to the feedstock, the sanitary status of the digestate is thus improved or in the worst case, the sanitary quality remains almost unchanged. According to this, the spreading of digestate on agricultural area in accordance to current rules and best practice recommendations is considered to impose no additional risk for the health of humans, animals and plants.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 99
页数:37
相关论文
共 170 条
[1]  
Ade-Kappelmann K, 2008, THESIS FREIE U BERLI
[2]   Laboratory evaluation of thermophilic-anaerobic digestion to produce class a biosolids. 2. Inactivation of pathogens and indicator organisms in a continuous flow reactor followed by batch treatment [J].
Aitken, MD ;
Sobsey, MD ;
Shehee, M ;
Blauth, KE ;
Hill, VR ;
Farrell, JB ;
Nappier, SP ;
Walters, GW ;
Crunk, PL ;
Van Abel, N .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2005, 77 (07) :3028-3036
[3]   Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during thermophilic anaerobic digestion of manure from dairy cattle [J].
Aitken, Michael D. ;
Sobsey, Mark D. ;
Van Abel, Nicole A. ;
Blauth, Kimberly E. ;
Singleton, David R. ;
Crunk, Phillip L. ;
Nichols, Cora ;
Walters, Glenn W. ;
Schneider, Maria .
WATER RESEARCH, 2007, 41 (08) :1659-1666
[4]  
Ammon A, 2002, GESUNDHEITSBERICHTER, V01, P1
[5]  
Andrade D, 2009, INT WISSENSCHAFTSTAG, V3, P529
[6]  
[Anonymous], INT ERFAHRUNGEN VERW
[7]   Introduction of a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach for assessment of selected microorganisms referred to EFSA [J].
Barlow, Sue ;
Chesson, Andrew ;
Collins, John D. ;
Dybing, Erik ;
Flynn, Albert ;
Fruijtier-Poelloth, Claudia ;
Hardy, Anthony ;
Knaap, Ada ;
Kuiper, Harry ;
Le Neindre, Pierre ;
Schans, Jan ;
Schlatter, Josef ;
Silano, Vittorio ;
Skerfving, Staffan ;
Vannier, Philippe .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2007, 5 (12)
[8]  
[Anonymous], HDB WATER WASTEWAT 3
[9]   Potential for Pathogen reduction in anaerobic digestion and biogas generation in Sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Avery, Lisa M. ;
Anchang, Kenneth Yongabi ;
Tumwesige, Vianney ;
Strachan, Norval ;
Goude, Peter J. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 70 :112-124
[10]   The effect of hygienic treatment on the microbial flora of biowaste at biogas plants [J].
Bagge, E ;
Sahlström, L ;
Albihn, A .
WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (20) :4879-4886