A representation theorem for voting with logical consequences

被引:50
作者
Gardenfors, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S026626710600085X
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper concerns voting with logical consequences, which means that anybody voting for an alternative x should vote for the logical consequences of x as well. Similarly, the social choice set is also supposed to be closed under logical consequences. The central result of the paper is that, given a set of fairly natural conditions, the only social choice functions that satisfy social logical closure are oligarchic (where a subset of the voters are decisive for the social choice). The set of conditions needed for the proof include a version of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives that also plays a central role in Arrow's impossibility theorem.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 190
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Arrow JK., 1951, SOCIAL CHOICE INDIVI
[2]  
Chapman B., 2002, POLIT PHILOS ECON, V1, P337, DOI DOI 10.1177/1470594X02001003004
[3]  
DIETRICH F, IN PRESS J EC THEORY
[4]   Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: A reconciliation [J].
Dryzek, JS ;
List, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 33 :1-28
[5]  
Elster J., 1986, Foundations of Social Choice Theory, P103
[6]  
Elster J., 1998, DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRA, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139175005
[7]  
KORNHAUSER LA, 1992, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V8, P441
[8]   Aggregating sets of judgments: Two impossibility results compared [J].
List, C ;
Pettit, P .
SYNTHESE, 2004, 140 (1-2) :207-235
[9]   Aggregating sets of judgments: An impossibility result [J].
List, C ;
Pettit, P .
ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2002, 18 (01) :89-110
[10]  
LIST C, 2001, GOOD SOC, V11, P72