Recent developments in reduction of sulphur emissions from selected Waterberg coal samples used in South African power plants

被引:9
作者
Makgato, S. S. [1 ]
Chirwa, E. M. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Dept Chem Engn, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Sulphur; Biodesulphurization; Sulphur dioxide; Emissions; Power plants; NATIVE BACTERIA; GAS EMISSIONS; DESULFURIZATION; COMBUSTION; COALFIELD; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123192
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sulphur content in the coal is the most notorious environmental contaminant, which produces sulphur dioxide (SO2) during combustion. In this study, the sulphur content of the parent coal samples reduced through biodesulphurization treatment and its influence on the SO2 emissions concentration in a power plant was monitored. Coal samples were screened to a particle size fraction of - 0.85 mm, -2.30 + 1.00 mm, - 4.60 + 2.30 mm and +4.60 mm prior to biodesulphurization treatment. Data used in this study comprised of average 2 daily interval sulphur content and SO2 emissions concentrations for the period 0 to 20 Days. The finer fraction of - 0.85 mm showed a significant reduction of sulphur content from 1.45 wt% to 0.50 wt% which translate to SO2 emissions concentration reduction from 3716 mg/Nm3 to 1280 mg/Nm(3). However, when the temperature was increased from 23 +/- 3 degrees C to 30 +/- 2 degrees C, further reduction of SO2 emissions to 1023 mg/Nm(3) was realized. Biodesulphurization treatment demonstrated to lower SO2 emissions by 72.4% and reduce ash content by some 33%. Moreover, pyrite was observed in vitrinite and inertinite, both syngenetically and epigenetically. The current study offers the possibility of reducing SO2 emissions in South African power plants through biodesulphurization treatment. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Opening the black box of accounting for greenhouse gas emissions: The different views of institutional bodies and firms
    Allini, Alessandra
    Giner, Begona
    Caldarelli, Adele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 2195 - 2205
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, 74042 ISO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, ANN BOOK ASTM STAND
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, 12902 ISO
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1994, METH DET MAC GROUP 3
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2010, ISO 1171
  • [7] Updating Chinese SO2 emissions with surface observations for regional air-quality modeling over East Asia
    Bae, Changhan
    Kim, Hyun Cheol
    Kim, Byeong-Uk
    Kim, Younha
    Woo, Jung-Hun
    Kim, Soontae
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 228 (228)
  • [8] Sulfur removal at high temperature during coal combustion in furnaces: a review
    Cheng, J
    Zhou, JH
    Liu, JZ
    Zhou, ZJ
    Huang, ZY
    Cao, XY
    Zhao, X
    Cen, KF
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2003, 29 (05) : 381 - 405
  • [9] Sulfur in coals: A review of geochemistry and origins
    Chou, Chen-Lin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2012, 100 : 1 - 13
  • [10] Combustion characteristics of coals using a drop-tube furnace
    Cloke, M
    Lester, E
    Thompson, AW
    [J]. FUEL, 2002, 81 (06) : 727 - 735