Voter satisfaction and electoral systems: Does preferential voting in candidate-centred systems make a difference?

被引:89
作者
Farrell, David M. [1 ]
McAllister, Ian
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Social Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00633.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Over the years, many scholars have examined the relationship between electoral systems and measures of voter satisfaction with democracy. The tendency in these studies has been to explore the traditional Proportional Representation/non-Proportional-Representation dichotomy, assessing whether more proportional systems produce higher levels of satisfaction. This article examines another dimension of electoral system variation - namely the degree to which the ballot structure incorporates ordinal, or preferential features. Given that proponents of such systems extol their virtues as offering voters 'greater choice', it is interesting to explore how this actually plays with the voters. The article makes use of cross-national data from the comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) project to examine the relationship between preferential voting and levels of satisfaction with democracy.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 749
页数:27
相关论文
共 54 条
[2]   Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Guillory, CA .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1997, 91 (01) :66-81
[3]  
[Anonymous], DEMOCRACY ELECT
[4]  
[Anonymous], ELECTORAL SYSTEMS
[5]  
BOLWER S, 2003, DEMOCRACY TRANSFORME
[6]   LEGISLATOR SHIRKING AND VOTER MONITORING - IMPACTS OF EUROPEAN-PARLIAMENT ELECTORAL SYSTEMS UPON LEGISLATOR VOTER RELATIONSHIPS [J].
BOWLER, S ;
FARRELL, DM .
JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 1993, 31 (01) :45-69
[7]  
BOWLER S, 2000, ELECT AUSTR IRELAND
[8]  
BOWLER S, 2002, ELECTORAL REFORM MIN
[9]  
BOWLER S, 1986, BRIT ELECT PARTIES Y
[10]  
BOWLER S, 2003, ELECT AUSTR IRELAND