N-Acetyl cysteine does not improve repeated intense endurance cycling performance of well-trained cyclists

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of antioxidant supplementation on intense endurance exercise performance and the physiologic exercise response acutely and in early recovery.MethodsWell-trained cyclists (n=11, peak VO2: 697ml/min/kg) completed two identical standardized 20-min warm-up periods (WU-1 and WU-2) prior to two performance tests (PT) with a duration of similar to 4min representing a qualifying (PT-1) and final race (PT-2) on the same day separated by 90min. Subjects were supplemented orally with placebo (PLA) and N-acetyl cysteine (NAC; 20mg/kg) before exercise in a double-blinded crossover design.ResultsMean power during PT-1 did not differ (P=0.39) between PLA (400 +/- 44W) and NAC (401 +/- 44W) as was the case during PT-2 with similar performance (P=0.74) between PLA (401 +/- 43W) and NAC (400 +/- 42W). Subjective readiness was lowered by prior exhaustive exercise from PT-1 to PT-2 (P=0.012) in both PLA and NAC. Plasma total antioxidant capacity was not affected by supplementation and prior exhaustive exercise (respective main effects: P=0.83 and P=0.19) which also was observed for peak VO2 at similar to 5L/min (P=0.84 and P=0.30). In WU-1 and WU-2, both cycling economy at similar to 20% (P=0.10 and P=0.21) and plasma potassium at similar to 5mmol/L (P=0.46 and P=0.26) were unaffected by supplementation and prior exercise.Conclusions Athletes executing maximal efforts of a similar to 4-min duration twice daily, as seen in track cycling, appear to gain no benefit from oral NAC supplementation on acute and subsequent performance following short-term recovery. Moreover, well-trained cyclists exhibit rapid recovery from a single bout of intense endurance cycling.