Effects of Caps on Cost Sharing for Skilled Nursing Facility Services in Medicare Advantage Plans

被引:4
作者
Keohane, Laura M. [1 ]
Rahman, Momotazur [2 ]
Thomas, Kali S. [2 ,3 ]
Trivedi, Amal N. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy, 2525 West End Ave,Suite 1200, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv Policy & Practice, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Providence Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Innovat Long Term Serv & Supports Vulnerable, Providence, RI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Post-acute care; cost-sharing; Medicare; managed care; CARE; ENROLLEES;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.15339
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a federal regulation effective in 2011 that limited how much that Medicare Advantage (MA) plans could charge for the first 20 days of care in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). DESIGN: Difference-in-differences retrospective analysis comparing SNF utilization trends from 2008-2012. SETTING: Select MA plans. PARTICIPANTS: Members of 27 plans with mandatory cost sharing reductions (n=132,000) and members of 21 plans without such reductions (n=138,846). MEASUREMENTS: Mean monthly number of SNF admissions and days per 1,000 members; annual proportion of MA enrollees exiting the plan. RESULTS: In plans with mandated cost sharing reductions, cost sharing for the first 20 days of SNF care decreased from an average of $2,039 in 2010 to $992 in 2011. In adjusted analyses, plans with mandated cost-sharing reductions averaged 158.1 SNF days (95% confidence interval (CI)=153.2-163.1 days) per 1,000 members per month before the cost sharing cap. This measure increased by 14.3 days (95% CI=3.8-24.8 days, p=0.009) in the 2 years after cap implementation. However, increases in SNF utilization did not significantly differ between plans with and without mandated cost-sharing reductions (adjusted between-group difference: 7.1 days per 1,000 members, 95% CI=-6.5-20.8, p=.30). Disenrollment patterns did not change after the cap took effect. CONCLUSIONS: When a federal regulation designed to protect MA members from high out-of-pocket costs for postacute care took effect, the use of SNF services did not change.
引用
收藏
页码:992 / 997
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2014, ANN CAL YEAR CY 2015
[2]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2010, MED PROGR POL TECHN
[3]   Patient Cost-Sharing and Hospitalization Offsets in the Elderly [J].
Chandra, Amitabh ;
Gruber, Jonathan ;
McKnight, Robin .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (01) :193-213
[4]  
Congressional Budget Office, 2013, CHANG COST SHAR RUL
[5]   NURSING-HOME DISCHARGES AND EXHAUSTION OF MEDICARE BENEFITS [J].
GARBER, AM ;
MACURDY, TE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 88 (423) :727-736
[6]   Less Intense Postacute Care, Better Outcomes For Enrollees In Medicare Advantage Than Those In Fee-For-Service [J].
Huckfeldt, Peter J. ;
Escarce, Jose J. ;
Rabideau, Brendan ;
Karaca-Mandic, Pinar ;
Sood, Neeraj .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2017, 36 (01) :91-100
[7]  
Institute of Medicine, 2013, VARIATION HLTH CARE, DOI DOI 10.17226/18393
[8]   The Residential History File: Studying Nursing Home Residents' Long-Term Care Histories [J].
Intrator, Orna ;
Hiris, Jeffrey ;
Berg, Katherine ;
Miller, Susan C. ;
Mor, Vince .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (01) :120-137
[9]  
Jacobson GretchenAnthony Damico., 2015, MEDICARE ADVANTAGE 2
[10]   A qualitative study of clinical decision making in recommending discharge placement from the acute care setting [J].
Jette, DU ;
Grover, L ;
Keck, CP .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2003, 83 (03) :224-236