ASSESSING EMPATHIC ATTITUDES IN MEDICAL STUDENTS: THE RE-VALIDATION OF THE JEFFERSON SCALE OF EMPATHYSTUDENT VERSION REPORT

被引:10
作者
Petek Ster, Marija [1 ]
Selic, Polona [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Dept Family Med, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
来源
ZDRAVSTVENO VARSTVO | 2015年 / 54卷 / 04期
关键词
empathy; attitude; values; medical students; self-assessment; PHYSICIAN EMPATHY; GENDER; SCHOOL; PSYCHOMETRICS; EDUCATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1515/sjph-2015-0037
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction. Self-reported scales, such as the Jefferson Scale of Empathy -Student version (JSE-S), had been recognised to measure the empathic disposition rather than behavioural expression. This study aimed to re-validate the JSE-S and its factor structure prior further research on empathy in medical students. Methods. A convenience sampling method was employed in two consecutive academic years, in 2012/13 and 2013/14, at the Faculty of Medicine in Ljubljana, Slovenia; first and final year students participated voluntarily. The JSE-S examined empathy levels. The principal component analysis was performed with Oblimin rotation and Kaisers' criteria. Factors with eigenvalues >= 1.25 were retained and items loading >= vertical bar 0.40 vertical bar were required for the interpretation of the factor structure. Results. The total study sample size was 845 students, (580 (68.6%)) of them women; 327 (72.2%) were in the first (19.2 +/- 1.9 years old) and 253 (61.7%) in the sixth (24.9 +/- 1.1 years old) year of medical school. Females achieved higher JSE-S scores in all groups. The three-factor JSE-S was confirmed, but only seven items were concordant in all groups. A higher proportion of explained variation for Perspective Taking and Standing in the Patient's Shoes, and better internal consistency, was found in a reduced-item scale (16-18 items). When performing factor analysis of a seven-item scale, the percentages of explained variance increased with two factors extracted. Conclusions. Only the cognitive dimension of JSE-S gave results as expected, therefore proper terminology, i.e. the object of assessment, must be used in further administration of JSE-S and empathy-related research in medical students.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 292
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   SYMPATHY AND EMPATHY [J].
ARING, CD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 167 (04) :448-452
[2]  
Bangash AS, 2013, F1000 RES, V2, P157
[3]   Variation of mood and empathy during internship [J].
Bellini, LM ;
Baime, M ;
Shea, JA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (23) :3143-3146
[4]   CARING FOR PATIENT [J].
BLUMGART, HL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1964, 270 (09) :449-&
[5]   The dynamics of change: Cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support [J].
Butow, PN ;
Maclean, M ;
Dunn, SM ;
Tattersall, MHN ;
Boyer, MJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (09) :857-863
[6]   A cross-sectional measurement of medical student empathy [J].
Chen, Daniel ;
Lew, Robert ;
Hershman, Warren ;
Orlander, Jay .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 (10) :1434-1438
[7]   The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Preliminary Psychometrics and Group Comparisons in Italian Physicians [J].
Di Lillo, Mariangela ;
Cicchetti, Americo ;
Lo Scalzo, Alessandra ;
Taroni, Francesco ;
Hojat, Mohammadreza .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2009, 84 (09) :1198-1202
[8]   What is clinical empathy? [J].
Halpern, J .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 18 (08) :670-674
[9]   A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine [J].
Hemmerdinger J.M. ;
Stoddart S.D.R. ;
Lilford R.J. .
BMC Medical Education, 7 (1)
[10]   Physician empathy: Definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty [J].
Hojat, M ;
Gonnella, JS ;
Nasca, TJ ;
Mangione, S ;
Vergare, M ;
Magee, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 159 (09) :1563-1569