Engaged at work? An employee engagement model in public relations

被引:45
作者
Shen, Hongmei [1 ]
Jiang, Hua [2 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Sch Journalism & Media Studies, 5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] Syracuse Univ, SI Newhouse Sch Publ Commun, Syracuse, NY USA
关键词
Employee engagement; organizational engagement strategy; positive messaging behavior; negative messaging behavior; contextual performance; structural equation modeling; INTERNAL COMMUNICATION; CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE; TASK-PERFORMANCE; JOB ENGAGEMENT; SAMPLE-SIZE; MANAGEMENT; LEADERSHIP; VALUES; SCALE; FIT;
D O I
10.1080/1062726X.2019.1585855
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Engagement has emerged as an important concept in public relations scholarship. Yet a theoretically informed model with a clear and coherent explication of the construct is still lacking. By situating our study in the internal organizational context, we provided an updated conceptualization and operationalization of employee engagement, proposing a strategy-engagement-behavior three-step employee engagement model. Results from an employee survey (n = 568) supported our conceptual model, showing that organizational engagement strategies positively predicted employee engagement, which in turn accounted for employees' positive and negative messaging behavior, as well as their contextual performance behavior. After controlling for significant demographic variables such as gender, age, organizational size, number of subordinates, and level of management position, we identified a complete mediation effect of employee engagement in our two-step structural equation modeling analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 49
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   EMOTION IN THE WORKPLACE - A REAPPRAISAL [J].
ASHFORTH, BE ;
HUMPHREY, RH .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1995, 48 (02) :97-125
[2]   Job Demands-Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Demerouti, Evangelia .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 22 (03) :273-285
[3]   PRACTICAL ISSUES IN STRUCTURAL MODELING [J].
BENTLER, PM ;
CHOU, CP .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1987, 16 (01) :78-117
[5]   Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research [J].
Borman, WC ;
Motowidlo, SJ .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1997, 10 (02) :99-109
[6]  
Broom GM, 2000, LEA COMMUN SER, P3
[7]   Looking back, moving forward: A review and reflection of the organization-public relationship (OPR) research [J].
Cheng, Yang .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2018, 44 (01) :120-130
[8]  
Chiles A.M., 1995, J APPL COMMUN RES, V23, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/00909889509365411
[9]   WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE [J].
Christian, Michael S. ;
Garza, Adela S. ;
Slaughter, Jerel E. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 64 (01) :89-136
[10]   CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS [J].
CRONBACH, LJ ;
MEEHL, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1955, 52 (04) :281-302