Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake from space-geodetic data

被引:138
作者
Johanson, Ingrid A.
Fielding, Eric J.
Rolandone, Frederique
Burgmann, Roland
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley Seismol Lab, Berkeley, CA 94027 USA
[2] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[3] Univ Paris 06, Lab Tecton, CNRS, UMR 7072, F-75252 Paris 05, France
关键词
D O I
10.1785/0120050818
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We invert interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data jointly with campaign and continuous global positioning system (GPS) data for slip in the coseismic and postseismic periods of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. The InSAR dataset consists of eight interferograms from data collected by the Envisat and Radarsat satellites spanning the time of the earthquake and variable amounts of the postseismic period. The two datasets complement each other, with the InSAR providing dense sampling of motion in the range direction of the satellite and the GPS providing more sparse, but three-dimensional measurements of ground motion. The model assumes exponential decay of the postseismic slip with a decay time constant of 0.087 years, determined from time series modeling of continuous GPS and creepmeter data. We find a geodetic moment magnitude of M 6.2 for a 1-day coseismic model and M-W 6.1 for the entire postseismic period. The coseismic rupture occurred mainly in two slip asperities; one near the hypocenter and the other 15-20 km north. Postseismic slip occurred on the shallow portions of the fault and near the rupture areas-of two M 5.0 aftershocks. A comparison of the geodetic slip models with seismic moment estimates suggests that the coseismic moment release of the Parkfield earthquake is as little as 25% of the total. This underlines the importance of aseismic slip in the slip budget for the Parkfield segment.
引用
收藏
页码:S269 / S282
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Amelung F, 1999, GEOLOGY, V27, P483, DOI 10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0483:STUADO>2.3.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake
    Bakun, WH
    Aagaard, B
    Dost, B
    Ellsworth, WL
    Hardebeck, JL
    Harris, RA
    Ji, C
    Johnston, MJS
    Langbein, J
    Lienkaemper, JJ
    Michael, AJ
    Murray, JR
    Nadeau, RM
    Reasenberg, PA
    Reichle, MS
    Roeloffs, EA
    Shakal, A
    Simpson, RW
    Waldhauser, F
    [J]. NATURE, 2005, 437 (7061) : 969 - 974
  • [4] THE PARKFIELD, CALIFORNIA, EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION EXPERIMENT
    BAKUN, WH
    LINDH, AG
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1985, 229 (4714) : 619 - 624
  • [5] BURFORD RO, 1980, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V70, P1233
  • [6] Synthetic aperture radar interferometry to measure Earth's surface topography and its deformation
    Bürgmann, R
    Rosen, PA
    Fielding, EJ
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCES, 2000, 28 : 169 - 209
  • [7] Rapid aseismic moment release following the 5 December, 1997 Kronotsky, Kamchatka, earthquake
    Bürgmann, R
    Kogan, MG
    Levin, VE
    Scholz, CH
    King, RW
    Steblov, GM
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2001, 28 (07) : 1331 - 1334
  • [8] Two-dimensional phase unwrapping with use of statistical models for cost functions in nonlinear optimization
    Chen, CW
    Zebker, HA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2001, 18 (02): : 338 - 351
  • [9] Rapid subsidence over oil fields measured by SAR interferometry
    Fielding, EJ
    Blom, RG
    Goldstein, RM
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1998, 25 (17) : 3215 - 3218
  • [10] Analysis of deformation data at Parkfield, California: Detection of a long-term strain transient
    Gao, SS
    Silver, PG
    Linde, AT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2000, 105 (B2) : 2955 - 2967