Low Contrast Visual Acuity Might Help to Detect Previous Optic Neuritis

被引:7
|
作者
Park, Soo-Hyun [1 ]
Park, Choul Yong [2 ,3 ]
Shin, Young Joo [4 ]
Jeong, Kyoung Sook [5 ]
Kim, Nam-Hee [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Inha Univ, Dept Internal Hosp, Dept Neurol, Dept Crit Care Med, Incheon, South Korea
[2] Dongguk Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Ilsan Hosp, Goyang, South Korea
[3] Dongguk Univ Seoul, Grad Sch Med, Goyang, South Korea
[4] Hallym Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Wonju Severance Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Med, Wonju, South Korea
[6] Dongguk Univ, Dept Neurol, Ilsan Hosp, Goyang, South Korea
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
optic neuritis; visual acuity; low contrast visual acuity; neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; multiple sclerosis; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; VISION; DIAGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY; TESTS;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2020.602193
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Optic neuritis (ON) has been considered to be an important factor in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), making ON detection increasingly critical for early diagnosis. Furthermore, subclinical ONs presenting no distinct decrease in visual acuity can be missed. Low contrast visual acuity (LC-VA) is known to be able to capture visual loss not seen in conventional high-contrast visual acuity (HC-VA) in MS. Therefore, to increase the sensitivity of ON detection, we investigated the advantage of LC-VA over conventional HC-VA. One hundred and eight patients with demyelinating disease (35 MS, 73 NMOSD) with ON at least 3 months prior and 35 controls underwent neuro-ophthalmic evaluation, including best-corrected conventional high contrast visual acuity (HC-VA) and 2.5% and 1.25% low contrast visual acuity (LC-VA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) of various visual functions were used to determine the most relevant visual function test for the detection of optic nerve involvement. Additionally, the optimal cutoff point was obtained from the Youden index (J-index) as the points with the best sensitivity-specificity balance. When distinguishing ON from non-ON, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was highest for the 2.5% LC-VA (0.835, P < 0.001; sensitivity 71.5%, specificity 88.6%), while it was 0.710 (P < 0.001) for the HC-VA and 0.770 (P < 0.001) for the 1.25% LC-VA. In discriminating between controls and ON, the AUC was also highest for the 2.5% LC-VA 0.754 (P < 0.001; sensitivity 71.5%, specificity 78.5%), while it was 0.719 (P < 0.001) for HC-VA and 0.688 (P < 0.001) for 1.25% LC-VA. In eyes with a history of ON (n = 137), the HC-VA and 2.5% LC-VA were abnormal in 64.2 and 71.5%, respectively (P < 0.001), with their combination detecting abnormalities in approximately 85.4% (P < 0.001). The 2.5% LC-VA was superior to HC-VA in detecting ON when distinguishing ON from non-ON or control. The 2.5% LC-VA might be a useful, feasible, and rapid method to detect ON. Furthermore, combining 2.5% LC-VA with conventional HC-VA would be better for detecting optic nerve involvements.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Repeatability of mesopic visual acuity measurements using high- and low-contrast ETDRS letter charts
    Barrio, Ana
    Antona, Beatriz
    Puell, Maria C.
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 253 (05) : 791 - 795
  • [42] Microdot test of foveal function. A comparison with visual acuity at high and low contrast
    Malmer, L
    Martin, L
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2005, 25 (02) : 81 - 86
  • [43] Reliability and validity of the Melbourne Test and High/Low Contrast Visual Acuity edge chart
    Haymes, SA
    Chen, J
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2004, 81 (05) : 308 - 316
  • [44] Two cases of optic neuritis in which relative afferent pupillary defect and decreased critical flicker fusion frequency could be detected before visual acuity worsened
    Mukaisho, M
    Nishida, Y
    Hayashi, O
    Iwami, T
    Nakamura, J
    Yakushigawa, H
    Kani, K
    NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 26 (03) : 163 - 168
  • [45] Increasing negative spherical aberration with soft contact lenses improves high and low contrast visual acuity in young adults
    Rae, Sheila M.
    Allen, Peter M.
    Radhakrishnan, Hema
    Theagarayan, Baskar
    Price, Holly C.
    Sailaganathan, Ananth
    Calver, Richard I.
    O'Leary, Daniel J.
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2009, 29 (06) : 593 - 601
  • [46] The effect of LASIK on best-corrected high- and low-contrast visual acuity
    Bailey, MD
    Olson, MD
    Bullimore, MA
    Jones, L
    Maloney, RK
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2004, 81 (05) : 362 - 368
  • [47] Evaluating loss of visual function in multiple sclerosis as measured by low-contrast letter acuity
    Balcer, Laura J.
    Frohman, Elliot M.
    NEUROLOGY, 2010, 74 (17) : S16 - S23
  • [48] Low contrast visual acuity in pseudophakic patients implanted with an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens
    Ricci, F
    Scuderi, G
    Missiroli, F
    Regine, F
    Cerulli, A
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 82 (06): : 718 - 722
  • [49] High and Low Contrast Visual Acuity After Artiflex Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation for the Correction of Myopia
    van Philips, Lucien A. M.
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 26 (06) : 423 - 429
  • [50] Effect of Initial Aflibercept, Laser, or Observation on Low-Contrast Visual Acuity in Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema and Good Vision: Ancillary Study Within a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Beaulieu, Wesley T.
    Glassman, Adam R.
    Baker, Carl W.
    Maguire, Maureen G.
    Johnson, Chris A.
    Melia, Michele
    Sun, Jennifer K.
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 10 (03): : 1 - 12