The insensitivity of 'willingness-to-pay' to the size of the good: New evidence for health care

被引:38
作者
Olsen, JA [1 ]
Donaldson, C
Pereira, J
机构
[1] Univ Tromso, Inst Community Med, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Hlth Econ Res Programme, N-0027 Oslo, Norway
[3] Newcastle Univ, Sch Populat & Hlth, Sci & Business Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AA, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Univ Nova Lisboa, Natl Sch Publ Hlth, P-1600560 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
psychometrics; cognitive processes;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00029-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper inquires into the existence of two types of scope insensitivity in health care; one deals with different numbers of patients treated from a programme, the other with different reductions in the risk of heart attack. Two empirical studies in Norway and Portugal were designed to measure the extent to which willingness-to-pay (WTP) varies with the size of health outcomes. Comparisons of WTP with different sizes of the goods were undertaken both across samples and within samples. The results showed no statistically significant differences in WTP with different sized health effects, something that casts doubt on the reliability of the WTP-method as an instrument for comparing the social values of competing health care programmes. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 460
页数:16
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
ARROW KJ, 1993, CONTINGENT VALUATION
[2]   On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part I - Caveat investigator [J].
Beattie, J ;
Covey, J ;
Dolan, P ;
Hopkins, L ;
Jones-Lee, M ;
Loomes, G ;
Pidgeon, N ;
Robinson, A ;
Spencer, A .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1998, 17 (01) :5-25
[3]  
Carter MW, 1998, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V1408, P3, DOI 10.1007/BFb0055878
[4]   Measuring heart patients' willingness to pay for changes in angina symptoms [J].
Chestnut, LG ;
Keller, MLR ;
Lambert, WE ;
Rowe, RD .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1996, 16 (01) :65-77
[5]  
DONALDSON C, 1999, DEV METHOD WILLINGNE
[6]   VALUING THE PREVENTION OF NONFATAL ROAD INJURIES - CONTINGENT VALUATION VS STANDARD GAMBLES [J].
JONESLEE, MW ;
LOOMES, G ;
PHILIPS, PR .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1995, 47 (04) :676-695
[7]   Scale and context effects in the valuation of transport safety [J].
JonesLee, MW ;
Loomes, G .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1995, 11 (03) :183-203
[8]   VALUING PUBLIC-GOODS - THE PURCHASE OF MORAL SATISFACTION [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
KNETSCH, JL .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1992, 22 (01) :57-70
[9]   SOME EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE ON EMBEDDING EFFECTS IN CONTINGENT VALUATION OF FOREST PROTECTION [J].
LOOMIS, J ;
LOCKWOOD, M ;
DELACY, T .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1993, 25 (01) :45-55
[10]  
Mitchell RC, 1988, USING SURVEYS VALUE