Conflict components of the Stroop effect and their "control"

[21] SKILL AND AUTOMATICITY - RELATIONS, IMPLICATIONS, AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1985, 39 (02): : 367 - 386

[22] WHEN IT HELPS TO BE MISLED - FACILITATIVE EFFECTS OF INCREASING THE FREQUENCY OF CONFLICTING STIMULI IN A STROOP-LIKE TASK [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 1979, 7 (03) : 166 - 174

[23] ATTENTION AND AUTOMATICITY IN STROOP AND PRIMING TASKS - THEORY AND DATA [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 12 (04) : 523 - 553

[24] Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (10) : 383 - 391

[25] Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2001, 29 (01) : 137 - 151

[26] Norman D.A., 1986, Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1

[27] Neuromagnetic evidence for early semantic access in word recognition [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (01) : 201 - 205

[28] The stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2008, 34 (03) : 514 - 523

[29] Contingency learning without awareness: Evidence for implicit control [J]. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2007, 16 (02) : 421 - 435

[30] The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model: Dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2013, 142 (01) : 119 - 126

[21] SKILL AND AUTOMATICITY - RELATIONS, IMPLICATIONS, AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1985, 39 (02): : 367 - 386

[22] WHEN IT HELPS TO BE MISLED - FACILITATIVE EFFECTS OF INCREASING THE FREQUENCY OF CONFLICTING STIMULI IN A STROOP-LIKE TASK [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 1979, 7 (03) : 166 - 174

[23] ATTENTION AND AUTOMATICITY IN STROOP AND PRIMING TASKS - THEORY AND DATA [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 12 (04) : 523 - 553

[24] Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (10) : 383 - 391

[25] Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2001, 29 (01) : 137 - 151

[26] Norman D.A., 1986, Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1

[27] Neuromagnetic evidence for early semantic access in word recognition [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (01) : 201 - 205

[28] The stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2008, 34 (03) : 514 - 523

[29] Contingency learning without awareness: Evidence for implicit control [J]. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2007, 16 (02) : 421 - 435

[30] The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model: Dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2013, 142 (01) : 119 - 126