Life-Cycle Break-Even Analysis of Electric Carsharing: A Comparative Study in China

被引:2
作者
Jia, Jingjing [1 ]
Ma, Shujie [2 ]
Xue, Yixi [3 ]
Kong, Deyang [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Dianji Univ, Sch Business, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Sch Automot Studies, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
electric carsharing; break-even moment; life-cycle cost; sensitivity analysis; EVCARD; LCCS; CAR-SHARING SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; TOTAL-COST; VEHICLES; MOBILITY; MODEL; ECONOMY; SYSTEMS; HYBRID; FLEET;
D O I
10.3390/su12166584
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Electric carsharing (ECS) is a potential option to address the problem of unsustainability in the transportation sector. The business-to-consumer model of ECS, which is one of several different electric carsharing models, has gained much popularity in recent years. Generating sufficient revenue to cover costs is a critical factor for ECS companies to maintain healthy development. This study makes an economic analysis, on the basis of life-cycle cost and monetary revenue associated with the operation of ECS, of two Chinese ECS companies: EVCARD and LCCS. Based on data gathered by field investigation, this study aims to determine the break-even moment for each company's main vehicle models by means of the net present value method. The results show that EVCARD achieved an earlier break-even moment than LCCS. The break-even moment of Chery eQ of EVCARD was the shortest of all the vehicle models, at only 181.3 min. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to portray how different cost-related and revenue-related factors influence the break-even moment. Our findings indicate that a wide difference exists in terms of the influence of different factors on the break-even moment. Among these, the manufacturer's suggested retail price is the most influential variable, followed by the unit rental price. The reaction of the break-even moment to the market price of a charging pile and the non-rental revenue per vehicle-especially the latter-was found to be negligible in the sensitivity analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework [J].
Acquier, Aurelien ;
Daudigeos, Thibault ;
Pinkse, Jonatan .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 125 :1-10
[2]  
Aversa P, 2017, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V58, P49
[3]   The roles of users in electric, shared and automated mobility transitions [J].
Axsen, Jonn ;
Sovacool, Benjamin K. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 71 :1-21
[4]  
Berger Roland, CAN CARSHARING SUCCE
[5]  
Bingxiang S., 2014, T CHINA ELECTROTECH, V4, P316
[6]   Determining optimal locations for charging stations of electric car-sharing systems under stochastic demand [J].
Brandstaetter, Georg ;
Kahr, Michael ;
Leitner, Markus .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2017, 104 :17-35
[7]  
Cao G.Y, SEVERAL CHANGES FUTU
[8]   Modelling the effect of different pricing schemes on free-floating carsharing travel demand: a test case for Zurich, Switzerland [J].
Ciari, Francesco ;
Balac, Milos ;
Balmer, Michael .
TRANSPORTATION, 2015, 42 (03) :413-433
[9]   Ride On! Mobility Business Models for the Sharing Economy [J].
Cohen, Boyd ;
Kietzmann, Jan .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 27 (03) :279-296
[10]  
Dai J.Q, POWER BATTERY COST W