Testing mechanisms of coexistence among two species of frugivorous primates

被引:45
作者
Houle, A
Vickery, WL
Chapman, CA
机构
[1] Univ Quebec, Dept Sci Biol, Grp Rech Ecol Forestiere Interuniv, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Anthropol, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T7, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Sch Environm, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T7, Canada
[4] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Bronx, NY 10460 USA
关键词
coexistence mechanism; contest competition; foraging efficiency; frugivory; giving-up density (GUD); Kibale National Park; patch depletion; Uganda;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01125.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. We examined mechanisms of coexistence between two congeneric species of frugivorous primates, the blue monkey (Cercopithecus mitis) and the red-tailed monkey (C. ascanius). 2. We used giving-up densities (the amount of food which animals leave in a patch) in fruit trees to measure foraging efficiency and to evaluate possible mechanisms of coexistence. Animals with higher giving-up densities are less likely to persist in the company of those with lower giving-up densities because the former are not able to exploit food patches used previously by the latter. We climbed trees to estimate giving-up densities by counting the fruit which primates left behind. 3. We tested five possible mechanisms of coexistence. Three mechanisms proposed that each frugivorous species has a lower giving-up density than the other in at least one of the following: (1) different tree species, (2) within-tree foraging zones or (3) seasons. The fourth mechanism predicted that the socially dominant species exploits resources first and that the subordinate species has lower giving-up densities. The final mechanism predicted that one species would find resources more quickly than the other, which would in turn have a lower giving-up density. 4. Four of the five mechanisms received no support from our data. Only a trade-off between interspecific dominance and giving-up densities was supported. 5. We discuss the generality of our results and possible interactions with other factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1044
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Altmann S. A., 1998, FORAGING SURVIVAL YE
  • [2] BODY SIZE-RELATED COEXISTENCE - AN APPROACH THROUGH ALLOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS OM HOME-RANGE USE
    BASSET, A
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1995, 76 (04) : 1027 - 1035
  • [3] Bocian C., 1997, Niche separation of black-and-white colobus monkeys (Colobus angolensis and C. guereza) in the Ituri Forest
  • [4] PATCH USE AS AN INDICATOR OF HABITAT PREFERENCE, PREDATION RISK, AND COMPETITION
    BROWN, JS
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1988, 22 (01) : 37 - 47
  • [5] FORAGING THEORY, PATCH USE, AND THE STRUCTURE OF A NEGEV DESERT GRANIVORE COMMUNITY
    BROWN, JS
    KOTLER, BP
    MITCHELL, WA
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (08) : 2286 - 2300
  • [6] DESERT RODENT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE - A TEST OF 4 MECHANISMS OF COEXISTENCE
    BROWN, JS
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1989, 59 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [7] Long-term effects of logging on African primate communities: a 28-year comparison from Kibale National Park, Uganda
    Chapman, CA
    Balcomb, SR
    Gillespie, TR
    Skorupa, JP
    Struhsaker, TT
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (01) : 207 - 217
  • [8] Spatial and temporal variability in the structure of a tropical forest
    Chapman, CA
    Chapman, LJ
    Wrangham, R
    Isabirye-Basuta, G
    Ben-David, K
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1997, 35 (04) : 287 - 302
  • [9] Chapman CA, 2000, AM J PRIMATOL, V50, P169, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(200003)50:3&lt
  • [10] 169::AID-AJP1&gt