Efficacy and safety of low dose ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:21
作者
Chen, Qing [1 ]
Zhang, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Wang, Zhen [1 ]
Wang, Shuai [1 ]
Zhang, Hao [2 ]
Wang, Yiwen [1 ]
Lu, Chi [1 ]
Xuan, Haochen [3 ]
Wang, Chaofan [3 ]
Li, Dongye [1 ]
Xu, Tongda [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Inst Cardiovasc Dis Res, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, Affiliated Hosp, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
coronary heart disease; cardiology; adult cardiology; PLATELET INHIBITION; EAST ASIANS; CLOPIDOGREL; PHARMACODYNAMICS; PLATO; PHARMACOKINETICS; ADHERENCE; STRATEGY; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137180
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Our aim was to examine clinical trials, provide guidance to practitioners and estimate the efficacy and safety of two agents by comparing low dose ticagrelor with standard dose clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome. We systematically looked through Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang data and CNKI for trials comparing low dose ticagrelor with standard dose clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with ACS since the database was created. The primary endpoint for efficacy was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The primary endpoint for safety was the rate of major bleeding events. We also evaluated platelet function between low dose ticagrelor and standard dose clopidogrel in ACS patients. From 6744 articles, 16 studies including 1629 patients met the inclusion criteria. In contrast with standard dose clopidogrel, low dose ticagrelor significantly reduced MACEs (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26, 0.58) and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). No difference was noted for major bleeding events (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.43, 3.08) between the two agents (p=0.77). In addition, low dose ticagrelor showed lower platelet aggregation rate than clopidogrel (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.68, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.53) (p<0.01). Platelet reaction units for low dose ticagrelor were much lower than those for standard dose clopidogrel (SMD -2.46, 95% CI -2.85 to -2.07) (p<0.01). In comparison with standard dose clopidogrel, low dose ticagrelor significantly lowered the incidence of MACEs, improved left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased left ventricular end diastolic dimension and did not expand the risk of major bleeding events or minor or minimal bleeding events in ACS patients with a considerable safety and efficacy profile. In addition, low dose ticagrelor was associated with dramatically lower platelet aggregation compared with standard dose clopidogrel.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 702
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Randomized Double-Blind Assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the Antiplatelet Effects of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease The ONSET/OFFSET Study
    Gurbel, Paul A.
    Bliden, Kevin P.
    Butler, Kathleen
    Tantry, Udaya S.
    Gesheff, Tania
    Wei, Cheryl
    Teng, Renli
    Antonino, Mark J.
    Patil, Shankar B.
    Karunakaran, Arun
    Kereiakes, Dean J.
    Parris, Cordel
    Purdy, Drew
    Wilson, Vance
    Ledley, Gary S.
    Storey, Robert F.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (25) : 2577 - U103
  • [12] Hao LX, 2017, PJCCPVD, V8, P50
  • [13] Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of ticagrelor in Asian patients with stable coronary artery disease
    Hiasa Y.
    Teng R.
    Emanuelsson H.
    [J]. Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, 2014, 29 (4) : 324 - 333
  • [14] HIGGINS JPT, 2011, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA, V0001
  • [15] Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the oral reversible P2Y12 antagonist AZD6140 with aspirin in patients with atherosclerosis:: a double-blind comparison to clopidogrel with aspirin
    Husted, S
    Emanuelsson, H
    Heptinstall, S
    Sandset, PM
    Wickens, M
    Peters, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (09) : 1038 - 1047
  • [16] Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and diabetes: a substudy from the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial
    James, Stefan
    Angiolillo, Dominick J.
    Cornel, Jan H.
    Erlinge, David
    Husted, Steen
    Kontny, Frederic
    Maya, Juan
    Nicolau, Jose C.
    Spinar, Jindrich
    Storey, Robert F.
    Stevens, Susanna R.
    Wallentin, Lars
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (24) : 3006 - 3016
  • [17] "East Asian Paradox": Challenge for the Current Antiplatelet Strategy of "One-Guideline-Fits-All Races" in Acute Coronary Syndrome
    Jeong, Young-Hoon
    [J]. CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 16 (05)
  • [18] JG H, 2018, CHINESE J PRACTICAL, V8, P114
  • [19] Jin P, 2017, DEP INTERNAL MED CAR, V13, P203
  • [20] Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel after fibrinolytic therapy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Kheiri, Babikir
    Osman, Mohammed
    Abdalla, Ahmed
    Haykal, Tarek
    Barbarawi, Mahmoud
    Zayed, Yazan
    Hicks, Michael
    Ahmed, Sahar
    Bachuwa, Ghassan
    Hassan, Mustafa
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2018, 46 (03) : 299 - 303