Approximate number system development in preschool: What factors predict change?

被引:21
|
作者
Purpura, David J. [1 ]
Simms, Victoria [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Ulster, Coleraine, Londonderry, North Ireland
关键词
Mathematics; Numeracy; Approximate number system; Response inhibition; Cardinal number knowledge; SYMBOLIC NUMERICAL MAGNITUDE; LOW-INCOME HOMES; MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; WORKING-MEMORY; YOUNG-CHILDREN; ACUITY; SKILLS; SENSE; DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.11.001
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
A large body of work has developed over the last decade examining the relation between the approximate number system (ANS) and mathematical performance across a wide range of ages, but particularly for preschool-age children. Largely, the evidence is mixed and suggests that a small relation exists that is dependent on a number of child-related or measurement-related factors. In contrast, little work has focused on understanding the stability and predictors of the ANS. These issues were examined by assessing 113 preschool children in the fall and spring of the preschool year on mathematical and cognitive assessments. Mixed-effect regressions indicated fall ANS performance was the strong predictor of spring ANS performance, suggesting moderate stability of this variable during preschool. However, cardinality and response inhibition were also significant predictors, and school-level variance was high. These findings indicate that the ANS may not be as foundational for mathematics development as previously suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 39
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How to estimate how well people estimate: Evaluating measures of individual differences in the approximate number system
    Chesney, Dana
    Bjalkebring, Par
    Peters, Ellen
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2015, 77 (08) : 2781 - 2802
  • [42] In How Many Ways is the Approximate Number System Associated with Exact Calculation?
    Pinheiro-Chagas, Pedro
    Wood, Guilherme
    Knops, Andre
    Krinzinger, Helga
    Lonnemann, Jan
    Starling-Alves, Isabella
    Willmes, Klaus
    Haase, Vitor Geraldi
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [43] Large-scale study of the precision of the approximate number system: Differences between formats, heterogeneity and congruency effects
    Malykh, S.
    Tarasov, S.
    Baeva, I.
    Nikulchev, E.
    Kolyasnikov, P.
    Ilin, D.
    Marnevskaia, I.
    Malykh, A.
    Ismatullina, V.
    Kuzmina, Y.
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (04)
  • [44] Measuring the approximate number system
    Gilmore, Camilla
    Attridge, Nina
    Inglis, Matthew
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 64 (11) : 2099 - 2109
  • [45] Numerical distance effect size is a poor metric of approximate number system acuity
    Chesney, Dana
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2018, 80 (05) : 1057 - 1063
  • [46] Visual form perception supports approximate number system acuity and arithmetic fluency
    Zhang, Yiyun
    Liu, Tianjiao
    Chen, Chuansheng
    Zhou, Xinlin
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2019, 71 : 1 - 12
  • [47] Interrelations Between Acuity of the Approximate Number System and Symbolic Skills in Preschool Children
    Munez, David
    Orrantia, Josetxu
    Sanchez, Rosario
    Carreton, Veronica
    Matilla, Laura
    JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 25 (05) : 754 - 775
  • [48] Preschoolers' Precision of the Approximate Number System Predicts Later School Mathematics Performance
    Mazzocco, Michele M. M.
    Feigenson, Lisa
    Halberda, Justin
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (09):
  • [49] Children's Arithmetic Development It Is Number Knowledge, Not the Approximate Number Sense, That Counts
    Goebel, Silke M.
    Watson, Sarah E.
    Lervag, Arne
    Hulme, Charles
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (03) : 789 - 798
  • [50] Bidirectional Mapping Between the Symbolic Number System and the Approximate Number System Differences in Connection Strength
    Wang, Lijuan
    Liang, Xiao
    Yin, Yueyang
    Kang, Jingmei
    EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 68 (05) : 243 - 263