Approximate number system development in preschool: What factors predict change?

被引:21
|
作者
Purpura, David J. [1 ]
Simms, Victoria [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Ulster, Coleraine, Londonderry, North Ireland
关键词
Mathematics; Numeracy; Approximate number system; Response inhibition; Cardinal number knowledge; SYMBOLIC NUMERICAL MAGNITUDE; LOW-INCOME HOMES; MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; WORKING-MEMORY; YOUNG-CHILDREN; ACUITY; SKILLS; SENSE; DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.11.001
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
A large body of work has developed over the last decade examining the relation between the approximate number system (ANS) and mathematical performance across a wide range of ages, but particularly for preschool-age children. Largely, the evidence is mixed and suggests that a small relation exists that is dependent on a number of child-related or measurement-related factors. In contrast, little work has focused on understanding the stability and predictors of the ANS. These issues were examined by assessing 113 preschool children in the fall and spring of the preschool year on mathematical and cognitive assessments. Mixed-effect regressions indicated fall ANS performance was the strong predictor of spring ANS performance, suggesting moderate stability of this variable during preschool. However, cardinality and response inhibition were also significant predictors, and school-level variance was high. These findings indicate that the ANS may not be as foundational for mathematics development as previously suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 39
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intergenerational associations of the approximate number system in toddlers and their parents
    Navarro, Monica G.
    Braham, Emily J.
    Libertus, Melissa E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 36 (04) : 521 - 539
  • [32] Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) - a research review
    Dietrich, Julia F.
    Huber, Stefan
    Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [33] Exploring the approximate number system in Sotos syndrome: insights from a dot comparison task
    Lane, C.
    Van Herwegen, J.
    Freeth, M.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (08) : 917 - 925
  • [34] False Approximations of the Approximate Number System?
    Gebuis, Titia
    van der Smagt, Maarten J.
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (10):
  • [35] Certainty in numerical judgments develops independently of the approximate number system
    Baer, Carolyn
    Odic, Darko
    COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 52
  • [36] The association between higher education and approximate number system acuity
    Lindskog, Marcus
    Winman, Anders
    Juslin, Peter
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [37] Young children 'solve for x' using the Approximate Number System
    Kibbe, Melissa M.
    Feigenson, Lisa
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2015, 18 (01) : 38 - 49
  • [38] Is Nonsymbolic Arithmetic Truly "Arithmetic"? Examining the Computational Capacity of the Approximate Number System in Young Children
    Cheng, Chen
    Kibbe, Melissa M. M.
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2023, 47 (06)
  • [39] Arithmetic Training Does Not Improve Approximate Number System Acuity
    Lindskog, Marcus
    Winman, Anders
    Poom, Leo
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [40] What counts in preschool number knowledge? A Bayes factor analytic approach toward theoretical model development
    Mou, Yi
    Berteletti, Ilaria
    Hyde, Daniel C.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 166 : 116 - 133