Combination of continuous paravertebral block and epidural anesthesia in postoperative pain control after esophagectomy

被引:10
作者
Niwa, Yukiko [1 ]
Koike, Masahiko [1 ]
Torii, Koji [1 ]
Oya, Hisaharu [1 ]
Iwata, Naoki [1 ]
Kanda, Mitsuro [1 ]
Kobayashi, Daisuke [1 ]
Tanaka, Chie [1 ]
Yamada, Suguru [1 ]
Fujii, Tsutomu [1 ]
Nakayama, Goro [1 ]
Sugimoto, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Nomoto, Shuji [1 ]
Fujiwara, Michitaka [1 ]
Kodera, Yasuhiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol Surg Surg 2, Showa Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4668550, Japan
关键词
Paravertebral block; Esophagectomy; Esophageal cancer; PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS; ANALGESIC EFFICACY; THORACIC-SURGERY; THORACOTOMY; METAANALYSIS; RELIEF;
D O I
10.1007/s10388-015-0487-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
We conducted paravertebral block (PVB) for thoracotomy, with epidural anesthesia carried out as usual for laparotomy. To date, there has been no report of combining continuous PVB for thoracotomy and epidural anesthesia for laparotomy after esophagectomy. The aim of this historical study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination. This is a retrospective analysis of 105 patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy at our institution from April 2012 to July 2014. Fifty-three patients underwent two epidural catheter placements for thoracotomy and laparotomy from April 2012 to March 2013 (EP group), and 52 underwent PVB for thoracotomy and epidural catheter for laparotomy from April 2013 to July 2014 (PVB group). In both groups, an anesthetic agent was continuously infused until postoperative day 7. PVB was placed by the surgical team at the end of the operation under direct vision. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding dosage of an additional analgesic agent. Only one catheter-related complication occurred, in the EP group. The frequency of hypotension in the PVB group was significantly lower than that in the EP group (9.6 and 30.2 %, respectively; P = 0.008). The time to ambulation in the PVB group was significantly shorter than that in the EP group (1.5 +/- A 0.5 days vs. 1.9 +/- A 0.9 days; P = 0.007). Combined PVB for thoracotomy and epidural anesthesia for laparotomy is safe and effective. This method should be considered a useful option for postoperative pain control after esophagectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 47
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Analgesic efficacy and safety of thoracic paravertebral and epidural analgesia for thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Baidya, Dalim Kumar
    Khanna, Puneet
    Maitra, Souvik
    [J]. INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 18 (05) : 626 - 635
  • [2] BARTLETT RH, 1973, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V137, P925
  • [3] Batra Ravinder Kumar, 2011, J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, V27, P5
  • [4] A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy -: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Davies, RG
    Myles, PS
    Graham, JM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 96 (04) : 418 - 426
  • [5] A Comparison of the Analgesia Efficacy and Side Effects of Paravertebral Compared with Epidural Blockade for Thoracotomy: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Ding, Xibing
    Jin, Shuqing
    Niu, Xiaoyin
    Ren, Hao
    Fu, Shukun
    Li, Quan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05):
  • [6] Pain relief after esophagectomy:: Thoracic epidural analgesia is better than parenteral opioids
    Flisberg, P
    Törnebrandt, K
    Walther, B
    Lundberg, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2001, 15 (03) : 282 - 287
  • [7] JAMES EC, 1981, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V82, P898
  • [8] Junior J, 2013, BRAZ J ANESSIOL, V63, P433, DOI [10.1016/j.bjane.2013.10.002, DOI 10.1016/J.BJANE.2013.10.002]
  • [9] Continuous paravertebral block for thoraco-abdominal oesophageal surgery
    Kelly, FE
    Murdoch, JA
    Sanders, DJ
    Berrisford, RG
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 60 (01) : 98 - 99
  • [10] Paravertebral block via the surgical field versus epidural block for patients undergoing thoracotomy: a randomized clinical trial
    Kobayashi, Rei
    Mori, Shoichi
    Wakai, Kenji
    Fukumoto, Koichi
    Saito, Takuya
    Katayama, Tatsuya
    Nakata, Junya
    Fukui, Takayuki
    Ito, Simon
    Abe, Tetsuya
    Hatooka, Shunzo
    Hosoda, Renko
    Mitsudomi, Tetsuya
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2013, 43 (09) : 963 - 969