Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization

被引:105
作者
Wood, EG [1 ]
Batzer, FR [1 ]
Go, KJ [1 ]
Gutmann, JN [1 ]
Corson, SL [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Penn Reprod Associates, Womens Inst Fertil Endocrinol & Menopause, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
embryo transfer; embryo transfer catheter; IVF; ultrasound guidance;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/15.1.107
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Attempts to improve clinical pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer are constantly being made. Two changes in technique of embryo transfer of potential clinical importance were evaluated over two contiguous time periods in order to observe any corresponding change in clinical pregnancy (CP) rate per transfer: (i) embryo transfer catheter; (ii) ultrasound guidance. Catheter choices mere hard: Tefcat, Tom Cat, or Norfolk; or soft: Frydman or Wallace. Ultrasound visualization was considered to be excellent/good when the catheter could be followed from the cervix to the fundus by transabdominal ultrasound with retention of the embryo-containing fluid droplet; fair/poor if visualization could not document the sequence of events. Embryo transfers were performed in 518 cycles. CP rates per transfer using soft and hard catheters was 36 and 17% (P < 0.000) respectively. CP rates per transfer for transfers performed with and without ultrasound guidance were 38 and 25% (P < 0.002) respectively. A statistically significant difference was also noted when visualization ranks were compared. CP rates per transfer in all excellent/good ultrasound-guided transfers was 41.5 versus 16.7% for fair/poor transfers (P < 0.038). In conclusion, performance of embryo transfer with a soft catheter under ultrasound guidance with good visualization resulted in a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rates.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 112
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   LOS-ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - THE INFLUENCE OF UTERINE POSITION ON PREGNANCY RATES WITH IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION-EMBRYO TRANSFER [J].
AGARWAL, SK ;
COE, S ;
BUYALOS, RP .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1994, 11 (06) :323-324
[2]   TRANSFER OF EMBRYOS INTO THE UTERUS - HOW MUCH DO TECHNICAL FACTORS AFFECT PREGNANCY RATES [J].
ALSHAWAF, T ;
DAVE, R ;
HARPER, J ;
LINEHAN, D ;
RILEY, P ;
CRAFT, I .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1993, 10 (01) :31-36
[3]   Is a prolonged bedrest following embryo transfer useful? [J].
Botta, G ;
Grudzinskas, G .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (11) :2489-2492
[4]  
CRAFT I, 1981, LANCET, V2, P1104
[5]  
EDWARDS R G, 1984, Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, V1, P3, DOI 10.1007/BF01129615
[6]  
ENGLERT Y, 1986, Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, V3, P243, DOI 10.1007/BF01132811
[7]   Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization [J].
Fanchin, R ;
Righini, C ;
Olivennes, F ;
Taylor, S ;
de Ziegler, D ;
Frydman, R .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (07) :1968-1974
[8]   DOES THE CHOICE OF CATHETER FOR EMBRYO TRANSFER INFLUENCE THE SUCCESS RATE OF INVITRO FERTILIZATION [J].
GONEN, Y ;
DIRNFELD, M ;
GOLDMAN, S ;
KOIFMAN, M ;
ABRAMOVICI, H .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1991, 6 (08) :1092-1094
[9]  
GRUNFELD L, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V78, P200
[10]  
HURLEY VA, 1991, FERTIL STERIL, V55, P559