Using the Contribution Analysis Approach to Evaluate Science Impact: A Case Study of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

被引:16
作者
Downes, Amia [1 ]
Novicki, Emily [1 ]
Howard, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, NIOSH, 1600 Clifton Rd,MS E20, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
关键词
government evaluation; impact evaluation; public health; case studies; POLICY;
D O I
10.1177/1098214018767046
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Interest from Congress, executive branch leadership, and various other stakeholders for greater accountability in government continues to gain momentum today with government-wide efforts. However, measuring the impact of research programs has proven particularly difficult. Cause and effect linkages between research findings and changes to morbidity and mortality are difficult to prove. To address this challenge, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health program evaluators used a modified version of contribution analysis (CA) to evaluate two research programs. CA proved to be a useful framework for assessing research impact, and both programs received valuable, actionable feedback. Although there is room to further refine our approach, this was a promising step toward moving beyond bibiliometrics to more robust assessment of research impact.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 189
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics [J].
Agarwal, Ashok ;
Durairajanayagam, Damayanthi ;
Tatagari, Sindhuja ;
Esteves, Sandro C. ;
Harlev, Avi ;
Henkel, Ralf ;
Roychoudhury, Shubhadeep ;
Homa, Sheryl ;
Garrido Puchalt, Nicolas ;
Ramasamy, Ranjith ;
Majzoub, Ahmad ;
Ly, Kim Dao ;
Tvrda, Eva ;
Assidi, Mourad ;
Kesari, Kavindra ;
Sharma, Reecha ;
Banihani, Saleem ;
Ko, Edmund ;
Abu-Elmagd, Muhammad ;
Gosalvez, Jaime ;
Bashiri, Asher .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2016, 18 (02) :296-309
[2]  
American Evaluation Association, 2013, EV ROADM MOR EFF GOV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CAN J PROGRAM EVAL
[4]   A practical example of Contribution Analysis to a public health intervention [J].
Biggs, Janice S. ;
Farrell, Louise ;
Lawrence, Glenda ;
Johnson, Julie K. .
EVALUATION, 2014, 20 (02) :214-229
[5]   Measuring impact in research evaluations: a thorough discussion of methods for, effects of and problems with impact measurements [J].
Bornmann, Lutz .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 73 (05) :775-787
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017, SCI IMP PROJ
[7]   Does health intervention research have real world policy and practice impacts: testing a new impact assessment tool [J].
Cohen, Gillian ;
Schroeder, Jacqueline ;
Newson, Robyn ;
King, Lesley ;
Rychetnik, Lucie ;
Milat, Andrew J. ;
Bauman, Adrian E. ;
Redman, Sally ;
Chapman, Simon .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 13
[8]   Applying contribution analysis: Lessons from five years of practice [J].
Delahais, Thomas ;
Toulemonde, Jacques .
EVALUATION, 2012, 18 (03) :281-293
[9]  
Gertler PJ, 2011, IMPACT EVALUATION IN PRACTICE, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8541-8
[10]   Research impact: a narrative review [J].
Greenhalgh, Trisha ;
Raftery, James ;
Hanney, Steve ;
Glover, Matthew .
BMC MEDICINE, 2016, 14