Assessing National Institutes of Health funding and scholarly impact in neurological surgery

被引:52
作者
Svider, Peter F. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Husain, Qasim [1 ]
Folbe, Adam J. [4 ]
Couldwell, William T. [5 ]
Liu, James K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Eloy, Jean Anderson [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Ctr Skull Base & Pituitary Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Univ Utah, Dept Neurosurg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
academic promotion; National Institutes of Health funding; h index; scholarly impact; research productivity; H-INDEX; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; GENDER DISPARITIES; ANESTHESIOLOGISTS; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; PROMOTION; TRENDS; CAREER;
D O I
10.3171/2013.8.JNS13938
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. Research productivity is increasingly important in academic neurological surgery and can be measured through a variety of methods, such as publications, objective bibliometrics, and securing external grant support. The authors' objectives were to determine whether there is an association between scholarly impact, as measured by the h index, and successful National Institutes of Health (NTH) grant funding awarded to faculty in neurological surgery departments. Methods. Primary investigators receiving National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards from Fiscal Years 2011 2013 were organized by academic rank, terminal degree, and their h index, as calculated from the Scopus database. These data were also obtained for nonfunded faculty from 15 randomly selected departments for comparison, and the average h index for each group was calculated. Results. National Institutes of Health funded faculty had higher average h indices than their nonfunded colleagues (23.6 vs 10.8, p < 0.0001), a finding that persisted upon controlling for academic rank. The mean h index increased with successive academic rank in both cohorts; greater funding totals were seen with successive academic position (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.05). National Institutes of Health funded MDs had higher h indices than their PhD colleagues (p = 0.04), although funding levels did not differ significantly. There was a trend of increasing h index with higher NTH-funding ranges (p < 0.05). Conclusions. The authors' findings demonstrate a strong relationship between scholarly impact and securing NIH funding among faculty in academic neurosurgical departments. Faculty receiving a greater amount of funding tended to have a higher h index. Mean scholarly impact, as measured by the h index, increased with successive academic rank among both NTH-funded and nonfunded faculty, suggesting that this bibliometric may have utility as an adjunct in the academic appointment and promotion process in academic neurological surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 196
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[22]   Use of the h index in neurosurgery Clinical article [J].
Lee, Janet ;
Kraus, Kristin L. ;
Couldwell, William T. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 111 (02) :387-392
[23]   H-index is a sensitive indicator of academic activity in highly productive anaesthesiologists: results of a bibliometric analysis [J].
Pagel, P. S. ;
Hudetz, J. A. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2011, 55 (09) :1085-1089
[24]   An analysis of scholarly productivity in United States academic anaesthesiologists by citation bibliometrics [J].
Pagel, P. S. ;
Hudetz, J. A. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (10) :873-878
[25]   Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members [J].
Pagel, P. S. ;
Hudetz, J. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 107 (03) :357-361
[26]   Scholarly Productivity of United States Academic Cardiothoracic Anesthesiologists: Influence of Fellowship Accreditation and Transesophageal Echocardiographic Credentials on h-Index and Other Citation Bibliometrics [J].
Pagel, Paul S. ;
Hudetz, Judith A. .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2011, 25 (05) :761-765
[27]   Gender disparity among US anaesthesiologists: are women underrepresented in academic ranks and scholarly productivity? [J].
Pashkova, A. A. ;
Svider, P. F. ;
Chang, C. Y. ;
Diaz, L. ;
Eloy, J. A. ;
Eloy, J. D. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 57 (08) :1058-1064
[28]   How honest is the h-index in measuring individual research output? [J].
Patro, B. K. ;
Aggarwal, A. K. .
JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2011, 57 (03) :264-265
[29]   Ranking Hepatologists: Which Hirsch's h-Index to prevent the "e-crise de foi-e"? [J].
Poynard, Thierry ;
Thabut, Dominique ;
Jabre, Patricia ;
Munteanu, Mona ;
Ratziu, Vlad ;
Benhamou, Yves ;
Deckmyn, Olivier .
CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 35 (05) :375-386
[30]   Distribution of the h-Index in Radiation Oncology Conforms to a Variation of Power Law: Implications for Assessing Academic Productivity [J].
Quigley, Matthew R. ;
Holliday, Emma B. ;
Fuller, Clifton D. ;
Choi, Mehee ;
Thomas, Charles R., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2012, 27 (03) :463-466