Development of an Official Guideline for the Economic Evaluation of Drugs/Medical Devices in Japan

被引:114
作者
Shiroiwa, Takeru [1 ]
Fukuda, Takashi [1 ]
Ikeda, Shunya [2 ]
Takura, Tomoyuki [3 ]
Moriwaki, Kensuke [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth & Welf Serv, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako, Saitama 3510197, Japan
[2] Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Ohtawara, Tochigi, Japan
[3] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Suita, Osaka, Japan
[4] Kobe Pharmaceut Univ, Dept Med Stat, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; discount; guideline; productivity loss; QALY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; MEASURING DRUG COSTS; FUTURE COSTS; TASK-FORCE; VALUE SET; HEALTH; PRODUCTIVITY; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.726
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: In Japan, cost-effectiveness evaluation was implemented on a trial basis from fiscal year 2016. The results will be applied to the future repricing of drugs and medical devices. On the basis of a request from the Central Social Insurance Medical Council (Chuikyo), our research team drafted the official methodological guideline for trial implementation. Here, we report the process of developing and the contents of the official guideline for cost-effectiveness evaluation. Methods: The guideline reflects discussions at the Chuikyo subcommittee (e.g., the role of quality-adjusted life-year) and incorporates our academic perspective. Team members generated research questions for each section of the guideline and discussions on these questions were carried out. A draft guideline was prepared and submitted to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), and then to the subcommittee. The draft guideline was revised on the basis of the discussions at the subcommitte, if appropriate. Results: Although the "public health care payer's perspective" is standard in this guideline, other perspectives can be applied as necessary depending on the objective of analysis. On the basis of the discussions at the subcommittee, quality-adjusted life-year will be used as the basic outcome. A discount rate of 2% per annum for costs and outcomes is recommended. The final guideline was officially approved by the Chuikyo general assembly in February 2016. Conclusions: This is the first officially approved guideline for the economic evaluation of drugs and medical devices in Japan. The guideline is expected to improve the quality and comparability of submitted cost-effectiveness data for decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 378
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Agency for Health Technology Assessment, 2009, GUID COND HLTH TECHN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GUID METH TECHN APPR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, GEN GUID EC EV PHARM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CHOIC METH EC EV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATI
[6]  
[Anonymous], PRESCR PHARM AN METH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Guidelines for Preparing Submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee
[8]  
Bae EY, 2009, VALUE HLTH S3, V12, P536
[9]   Korean Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation (Second and Updated Version) Consensus and Compromise [J].
Bae, SeungJin ;
Lee, SooOk ;
Bae, Eun Young ;
Jang, Sunmee .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (04) :257-267
[10]  
Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, 2012, KCE REPORTS