Employee performance, well-being, and differential effects of human resource management subdimensions: Mutual gains or conflicting outcomes?

被引:129
作者
Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere [1 ]
Messersmith, Jake [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Business Sch, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Nebraska, Coll Business, Lincoln, NE USA
关键词
affective commitment; HRM practices; innovative behaviours; job demands; stress; well-being; INVOLVEMENT WORK PROCESSES; HR PRACTICES; INTENSIFICATION; COMMITMENT; SYSTEMS; ATTRIBUTIONS; EMPOWERMENT; CONTINUANCE; BEHAVIORS; MEDIATION;
D O I
10.1111/1748-8583.12203
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The human resource management (HRM) literature supports the idea that coherent systems of HRM practices can induce attitudinal effects when perceived subjectively by employees. Recently, scholars have proposed that subdimensions of HRM systems exist and account for variance in outcomes. This study explores differential effects of three subdimensions of HRM systems (skill-, motivation-, and opportunity-enhancing HRM practices) on employee innovative behaviours and well-being. Our predictions are based on the mutual gains perspective, which specifies positive relationships between HRM practices and employee performance, and the conflicting outcomes perspective that links HRM practices to higher job demands and stress. Using data from the Finnish 2012 Practices of Working Life Survey, we find support for both the mutual gains and conflicting outcomes perspectives; however, we also show that the effects of the subsets of HRM practices are heterogeneous.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 526
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model [J].
Alfes, K. ;
Shantz, A. D. ;
Truss, C. ;
Soane, E. C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 24 (02) :330-351
[2]   The link between perceived HRM practices, performance and well-being: the moderating effect of trust in the employer [J].
Alfes, Kerstin ;
Shantz, Amanda ;
Truss, Catherine .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 22 (04) :409-427
[3]   THE MEASUREMENT AND ANTECEDENTS OF AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION [J].
ALLEN, NJ ;
MEYER, JP .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 63 (01) :1-18
[4]  
Appelbaum E., 2000, Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.2001.4845847
[5]  
Asparouhov T., 2006, AM STAT ASS C
[6]  
Bakker A.B., 2007, J MANAGERIAL PSYCHOL, V22, P309, DOI DOI 10.1108/02683940710733115
[7]   TIGHTENING THE IRON CAGE - CONCERTIVE CONTROL IN SELF-MANAGING TEAMS [J].
BARKER, JR .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1993, 38 (03) :408-437
[8]   High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being [J].
Boxall, Peter ;
Macky, Keith .
WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY, 2014, 28 (06) :963-984
[9]  
Boxall P, 2011, J MANAGE STUD, V48, P1504, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-6486.2010.00973.X
[10]   Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour [J].
de Jong, Jeroen ;
den Hartog, Deanne .
CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 19 (01) :23-36