Prediction of visibility and aerosol within the operational Met Office Unified Model. II: Validation of model performance using observational data

被引:36
作者
Haywood, Jim [1 ]
Bush, Mike [1 ]
Abel, Steven [1 ]
Claxton, Bernie [1 ]
Coe, Hugh [2 ]
Crosier, Jonathan [2 ]
Harrison, Mark [1 ]
Macpherson, Bruce [1 ]
Naylor, Mark [1 ]
Osborne, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] Met Off, Exeter EX1 3PB, Devon, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
aerosol; visibility; pollution;
D O I
10.1002/qj.275
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The operational version of the Met Office Unified Model forecasts aerosol and visibility products, as described in Part I. The modelling relies on parametrizations for the aerosol size distribution which account for the coagulation of aerosols into the accumulation mode, and for the hygroscopic uptake of water by aerosols. Aircraft and surface-based measurements are used to assess these parametrizations and to assess the performance of the modelled aerosol mass mixing ratio and visibility. Measurements of aerosol chemical composition with an airborne aerosol mass spectrometer suggest that much of the aerosol is a complex mixture of sulphate, nitrate and organic material, rather than ammonium sulphate alone, as assumed in the model. Some significant improvements can be made to the hygroscopic parametrizations, along with more minor adjustments to the aerosol size distribution, and aerosol extinction efficiency. Comparisons of the measured aerosol mass mixing ratio reveal measurement-model agreement within a factor of two for the four cases investigated here, while comparisons of visibility reveal a systematic bias to low visibilities in the model, particularly in clean atmospheric conditions. Formulations and strategies to improve the model are suggested. (C) Royal Meteorological Society and Crown Copyright, 2008
引用
收藏
页码:1817 / 1832
页数:16
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   Comparison of aerosol size distributions, radiative properties, and optical depths determined by aircraft observations and Sun photometers during SAFARI 2000 [J].
Haywood, J ;
Francis, P ;
Dubovik, O ;
Glew, M ;
Holben, B .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D13)
[12]   Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review [J].
Haywood, J ;
Boucher, O .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2000, 38 (04) :513-543
[13]  
Jones A, 2004, WEATHER, V59, P311, DOI [10.1256/wea.106.04, DOI 10.1256/WEA.106.04]
[14]  
Koschmieder H., 1924, Beitr. Phys. freien Atmos., P33
[15]   Humidification factors for atmospheric aerosols off the mid-Atlantic coast of the United States [J].
Kotchenruther, RA ;
Hobbs, PV ;
Hegg, DA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D2) :2239-2251
[16]   In situ and remote-sensing measurements of the mean microphysical and optical properties of industrial pollution aerosol during ADRIEX [J].
Osborne, S. R. ;
Haywood, J. M. ;
Bellouin, N. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 133 :17-32
[17]   Aircraft observations of the microphysical and optical properties of major aerosol species [J].
Osborne, SR ;
Haywood, JM .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2005, 73 (3-4) :173-201
[18]  
OSBORNE SR, 2006, 57 OBR MET OFF
[19]   Validation of the UK Met. Office's name model against the ETEX dataset [J].
Ryall, DB ;
Maryon, RH .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 32 (24) :4265-4276
[20]  
STRAPP JW, 1992, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V9, P548, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(1992)009<0548:HADASD>2.0.CO