Nonlinear Assembly Tolerance Design for Spatial Mechanisms Based on Reliability Methods

被引:12
|
作者
Yin, Yin [1 ]
Hong, Nie [1 ]
Fei, Feng [2 ]
Wei Xiaohui [1 ]
Ni Huajin [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, State Key Lab Mech & Control Mech Struct, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] China Acad Launch Vehicle Technol, Beijing 100076, Peoples R China
[3] China COMAC Shanghai Aircraft Design & Res Inst, Shanghai 201210, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
spatial mechanism; tolerance design; dimension chain equation; surrogate model; successful assembly rate; tolerance allocation; RESPONSE-SURFACE; STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY; OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHM; NETWORKS; QUALITY; MACHINE; SYSTEMS; PLANAR;
D O I
10.1115/1.4035433
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Assembly tolerance design for spatial mechanisms is a complex engineering problem that involves a highly nonlinear dimension chain equation and challenges in simplifying the spatial mechanism matrix equation. To address the nonlinearity of the problem and the difficulty of simplifying the dimension chain equation, this paper investigates the use of the Rackwitz-Fiessler (R-F) reliability analysis method and several surrogate model methods, respectively. The tolerance analysis results obtained for a landing gear assembly problem using the R-F method and the surrogate model methods indicate that compared with the extremum method and the probability method, the R-F method allows more accurate and efficient computation of the successful assembly rate, a reasonable tolerance allocation design, and cost reductions of 37% and 16%, respectively. Moreover, the surrogate-model-based computation results show that the support vector machine (SVM) method offers the highest computational accuracy among the three investigated surrogate methods but is more time consuming, whereas the response surface method and the back propagation (BP) neural network method offer relatively low accuracy but higher calculation efficiency. Overall, all of the surrogate model methods provide good computational accuracy while requiring far less time for analysis and computation compared with the simplification of the dimension chain equation or the Monte Carlo method.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assembly Tolerance Design Based on Skin Model Shapes Considering Processing Feature Degradation
    He, Ci
    Zhang, Shuyou
    Qiu, Lemiao
    Liu, Xiaojian
    Wang, Zili
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (16):
  • [2] Research on assembly tolerance allocation and quality control based on fuzzy reliability
    Wang, Min-Long
    Liu, Xin-Tian
    Wang, Yan-Song
    Wang, Xiao-Lan
    Guo, Hui
    Xing, Yan-Feng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2016, 230 (20) : 3755 - 3766
  • [3] An Overview of Adaptive-Surrogate-Model-Assisted Methods for Reliability-Based Design Optimization
    Ling, Chunyan
    Kuo, Way
    Xie, Min
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2023, 72 (03) : 1243 - 1264
  • [4] Tolerance optimization in assembly stacks based on capable design
    Swift, KG
    Raines, M
    Booker, JD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 1999, 213 (07) : 677 - 693
  • [5] Methods for Ensuring Fault Tolerance of Equipment Based on Reliability Theory
    Chernyi, Sergei G.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 IEEE CONFERENCE OF RUSSIAN YOUNG RESEARCHERS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING (EICONRUS), 2018, : 24 - 28
  • [6] A multiple alternative processes-based cost-tolerance optimal model for aircraft assembly
    Jing, Tao
    Tian, Xitian
    Liu, Xiang
    Hao, Hu
    Zhang, Min
    Li, Bo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 107 (1-2) : 667 - 677
  • [7] Comparison of the reliability-based and safety factor methods for structural design
    Wang, Xiaojun
    Shi, Qinghe
    Fan, Weichao
    Wang, Ruixing
    Wang, Lei
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2019, 72 : 68 - 84
  • [8] Reliability-based optimal tolerance design of mechanical systems including epistemic uncertainty
    Hassani, H.
    Khodaygan, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICS AND MATERIALS IN DESIGN, 2023, 19 (02) : 483 - 500
  • [9] Calibration methods for reliability-based design codes
    Gayton, N
    Mohamed, A
    Sorensen, JD
    Pendola, M
    Lemaire, M
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2004, 26 (01) : 91 - 121
  • [10] Reliability modeling-based tolerance design and process parameter analysis considering performance degradation
    Kong, Xuefeng
    Yang, Jun
    Hao, Songhua
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 207