Effect of Rifampicin on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Dose of Vemurafenib in Patients With BRAFV600 Mutation-Positive Metastatic Malignancy

被引:6
作者
Zhang, Weijiang [1 ]
McIntyre, Christine [2 ]
Forbes, Harper [3 ]
Gaafar, Rabab [4 ]
Kohail, Hanaa [5 ]
Beck, J. Thaddeus [6 ]
Plestina, Stjepko [7 ,8 ]
Bertran, Enric [9 ]
Riehl, Todd [9 ]
机构
[1] F Hoffmann La Roche Ltd, New York, NY USA
[2] Roche Prod Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, Herts, England
[3] Hoffmann La Roche Ltd, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[4] Cairo Univ, Natl Canc Inst, Cairo, Egypt
[5] Alexandria Univ, Med Res Inst, Alexandria, Egypt
[6] Highlands Oncol Grp, Fayetteville, AR USA
[7] Sch Med, Zagreb, Croatia
[8] Univ Hosp Ctr Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
[9] Genentech Inc, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
来源
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT | 2019年 / 8卷 / 06期
关键词
drug-drug interactions; pharmacokinetics; rifampicin; vemurafenib; PREGNANE X-RECEPTOR; OPEN-LABEL; BRAF; MELANOMA; CYTOCHROME-P-450; COBIMETINIB; EXPRESSION; EFFICACY; DEFINES; PHASE-3;
D O I
10.1002/cpdd.643
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Vemurafenib prolongs survival in patients with BRAF(V600)-mutated advanced melanoma. In vitro studies show cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 is involved in vemurafenib metabolism, but the effect of strong inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4 on vemurafenib exposure in vivo is unknown. This phase 1, open-label, multicenter study evaluated the effect of rifampicin, a CYP3A4 inducer, on the pharmacokinetics of single-dose vemurafenib in 27 patients with BRAF(V600) mutation-positive metastatic malignancy. Patients received a single oral dose of vemurafenib 960 mg on day 1, oral rifampicin 600 mg daily on days 8-16 (period B), and a single oral dose of vemurafenib 960 mg on day 17 and rifampicin 600 mg daily for days 17-23 (period C), with plasma samples obtained up to 168 hours after vemurafenib dosing. The geometric mean ratio (period C/period A) of area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to last measurable concentration time point and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity for vemurafenib (n = 23 for the pharmacokinetic analysis) was 0.61 (90% confidence interval, 0.48-0.78) and 0.60 (90% confidence interval, 0.47-0.76), respectively, indicating rifampicin significantly decreased vemurafenib plasma exposure by approximately 40%. The geometric mean ratio of the maximum concentration for vemurafenib was 1.1; this slight increase is likely owing to one outlier in period C. Adverse events were consistent with those previously seen for rifampicin and for vemurafenib monotherapy. Caution is advised when dosing vemurafenib concurrently with CYP3A4 inducers.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 843
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [11] An orphan nuclear receptor activated by pregnanes defines a novel steroid signaling pathway
    Kliewer, SA
    Moore, JT
    Wade, L
    Staudinger, JL
    Watson, MA
    Jones, SA
    McKee, DD
    Oliver, BB
    Willson, TM
    Zetterström, RH
    Perlmann, T
    Lehmann, JM
    [J]. CELL, 1998, 92 (01) : 73 - 82
  • [12] Combined Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib in BRAF-Mutated Melanoma
    Larkin, James
    Ascierto, Paolo A.
    Dreno, Brigitte
    Atkinson, Victoria
    Liszkay, Gabriella
    Maio, Michele
    Mandala, Mario
    Demidov, Lev
    Stroyakovskiy, Daniil
    Thomas, Luc
    de la Cruz-Merino, Luis
    Dutriaux, Caroline
    Garbe, Claus
    Sovak, Mika A.
    Chang, Ilsung
    Choong, Nicholas
    Hack, Stephen P.
    McArthur, Grant A.
    Ribas, Antoni
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (20) : 1867 - 1876
  • [13] The human orphan nuclear receptor PXR is activated by compounds that regulate CYP3A4 gene expression and cause drug interactions
    Lehmann, JM
    McKee, DD
    Watson, MA
    Willson, TM
    Moore, JT
    Kliewer, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1998, 102 (05) : 1016 - 1023
  • [14] Activation Status of the Pregnane X Receptor Influences Vemurafenib Availability in Humanized Mouse Models
    MacLeod, A. Kenneth
    McLaughlin, Lesley A.
    Henderson, Colin J.
    Wolf, C. Roland
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75 (21) : 4573 - 4581
  • [15] Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAFV600E and BRAFV600K mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study
    McArthur, Grant A.
    Chapman, Paul B.
    Robert, Caroline
    Larkin, James
    Haanen, John B.
    Dummer, Reinhard
    Ribas, Antoni
    Hogg, David
    Hamid, Omid
    Ascierto, Paolo A.
    Garbe, Claus
    Testori, Alessandro
    Maio, Michele
    Lorigan, Paul
    Lebbe, Celeste
    Jouary, Thomas
    Schadendorf, Dirk
    O'Day, Stephen J.
    Kirkwood, John M.
    Eggermont, Alexander M.
    Dreno, Brigitte
    Sosman, Jefferey A.
    Flaherty, Keith T.
    Yin, Ming
    Caro, Ivor
    Cheng, Suzanne
    Trunzer, Kerstin
    Hauschild, Axel
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (03) : 323 - 332
  • [16] Inducing properties of rifampicin and rifabutin for selected enzyme activities of the cytochrome P-450 and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase superfamilies in female rat liver
    Oesch, F
    Arand, M
    Benedetti, MS
    Castelli, MG
    Dostert, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 37 (06) : 1111 - 1119
  • [17] Rae JM, 2001, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V299, P849
  • [18] The Effects of a High-Fat Meal on Single-Dose Vemurafenib Pharmacokinetics
    Ribas, Antoni
    Zhang, Weijiang
    Chang, Ilsung
    Shirai, Keisuke
    Ernstoff, Marc S.
    Daud, Adil
    Cowey, C. Lance
    Daniels, Gregory
    Seja, Elizabeth
    O'Laco, Elizabeth
    Glaspy, John A.
    Chmielowski, Bartosz
    Hill, Todd
    Joe, Andrew K.
    Grippo, Joseph F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 54 (04): : 368 - 374
  • [19] Pharmacokinetic Interaction of Rifampicin with Oral Versus Intravenous Anticancer Drugs: Challenges, Dilemmas and Paradoxical Effects Due to Multiple Mechanisms
    Srinivas N.R.
    [J]. Drugs in R&D, 2016, 16 (2) : 141 - 148
  • [20] Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Vemurafenib
    Zhang, Weijiang
    Heinzmann, Dominik
    Grippo, Joseph F.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2017, 56 (09) : 1033 - 1043