Multiparametric 3T MRI in the evaluation of intraglandular prostate cancer: Correlation with histopathology

被引:12
作者
Styles, Colin [1 ]
Ferris, Nicholas [1 ]
Mitchell, Catherine [1 ]
Murphy, Declan [1 ]
Frydenberg, Mark [2 ]
Mills, John [3 ]
Pedersen, John
Bergen, Noelene [1 ]
Duchesne, Gillian [1 ]
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Burnet Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
diagnosis; magnetic resonance imaging; pathology; prostate cancer; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; VOLUME; LOCALIZATION; BIOPSY; GRADE;
D O I
10.1111/1754-9485.12189
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Prostate cancer is common and may be treated immediately or managed conservatively by observation. We sought to determine how reliable multiparametric MRI is in the detection of intraprostatic prostate cancer and what role it has in risk stratification. Methods: The histology from 38 whole mount prostate specimens was compared with preoperative multiparametric 3T MRI studies with an endorectal receiver coil in place. T1-weighted, T2-weighted, diffusion (b values 50 400 800), perfusion (V-e, K-ep, K-trans, area under the curve) and proton spectroscopic sequences were used. Results: For cancers greater than 0.5 cc, the detection rate for combined T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was 85%. For cancers 0.1 cc-0.5 cc, the sensitivity was 52%. Per patient, false positive rate was 50% for combined T2-weighted imaging and DWI. Perfusion imaging had a sensitivity of 70% for tumours greater than 0.5 cc but had a per patient false positive rate of 80% influenced by benign prostatic hypertrophy. In only 15 patients could a satisfactory spectroscopy study be obtained. Weak correlation was found between the Gleason score and tumour size (r = 0.51), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (r = -0.30) and (choline + creatine)/citrate ratio (r = 0.41). Conclusion: T2-weighted imaging and DWI in combination were the best strategy for detecting prostate cancer and had a sensitivity of 85% for detecting lesions greater than 0.5 cc. At 3T, an ADC threshold of between 1100-1200.10(-6) mm(2)/s was optimal for diagnosing prostate cancer. There are significant limitations in the use of perfusion and spectroscopy to detect prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted or guided biopsy post-MRI imaging is likely to be needed in some patients to assist risk stratification.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 448
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Do low-grade and low-volume prostate cancers bear the hallmarks of malignancy? [J].
Ahmed, Hashim Uddin ;
Arya, Manit ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (11) :E509-E517
[2]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[3]   Clinical staging error in prostate cancer: localization and relevance of undetected tumour areas [J].
Bolenz, Christian ;
Gierth, Michael ;
Grobholz, Rainer ;
Koepke, Thomas ;
Semjonow, Axel ;
Weiss, Christel ;
Alken, Peter ;
Michel, Maurice Stephan ;
Trojan, Lutz .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (09) :1184-1189
[4]   A streamlined three-dimensional volume estimation method accurately classifies prostate tumors by volume [J].
Chen, ME ;
Johnston, D ;
Reyes, AO ;
Soto, CP ;
Babaian, RJ ;
Troncoso, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 27 (10) :1291-1301
[5]   Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: The Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis [J].
Cohen, Michael S. ;
Hanley, Robert S. ;
Kurteva, Teodora ;
Ruthazer, Robin ;
Silverman, Mark L. ;
Sorcini, Andrea ;
Hamawy, Karim ;
Roth, Robert A. ;
Tuerk, Ingolf ;
Libertino, John A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (02) :371-381
[6]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[7]   The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Allsbrook, WC ;
Amin, MB ;
Egevad, LL ;
Bastacky, S ;
Beltrán, AL ;
Berner, A ;
Billis, A ;
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Cheng, L ;
Civantos, F ;
Cohen, C ;
Cohen, MB ;
Datta, M ;
Davis, C ;
Delahunt, B ;
Delprado, W ;
Eble, JN ;
Foster, CS ;
Furusato, M ;
Gaudin, PB ;
Grignon, DJ ;
Humphrey, PA ;
Iczkowski, KA ;
Jones, EC ;
Lucia, S ;
McCue, PA ;
Nazeer, T ;
Oliva, E ;
Pan, CC ;
Pizov, G ;
Reuter, V ;
Samaratunga, H ;
Sebo, T ;
Sesterhenn, I ;
Shevchuk, M ;
Srigley, JR ;
Suzigan, S ;
Takahashi, H ;
Tamboli, P ;
Tan, PH ;
Têtu, B ;
Tickoo, S ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Troncoso, P ;
Tsuzuki, T ;
True, LD ;
van der Kwast, T ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Wojno, KJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) :1228-1242
[8]   Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging [J].
Fuetterer, Jurgen J. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. ;
Scheenen, Tom W. J. ;
Veltman, Jeroen ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
Vos, Pieter ;
Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Krabbe, Paul F. M. ;
Heerschap, Arend ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) :449-458
[9]   Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Scheenen, Thomas ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (02) :453-461
[10]   Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection, Localization, and Staging [J].
Hoeks, Caroline M. A. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Yakar, Derya ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. ;
Scheenen, Tom W. J. ;
Vos, Pieter C. ;
Huisman, Henkjan ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Heerschap, Arend ;
Fuetterer, Jurgen J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 261 (01) :46-66