Tool use imagery triggers tool incorporation in the body schema

被引:38
作者
Baccarini, Matteo [1 ,2 ]
Martel, Marie [2 ,3 ]
Cardinali, Lucilla [1 ,2 ]
Sillan, Olivier [1 ,2 ]
Farne, Alessandro [1 ,2 ]
Roy, Alice C. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 1, Lyon Neurosci Res Ctr, INSERM, U1028,CNRS,UMR5292,ImpAct Team, F-69365 Lyon, France
[2] Hosp Civils Lyon Mouvement & Handicap, Lyon, France
[3] Univ Lyon 1, Inst Cognit Sci, CNRS, Lab Language Brain & Cognit L2C2,UMR 5304, F-69365 Lyon, France
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2014年 / 5卷
关键词
tool-use; mental imagery; body representation; action; kinematics; MOTOR; SPACE; PERCEPTION; DISTANCE; REAL;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00492
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Tool-use has been shown to modify the way the brain represents the metrical characteristics of the effector controlling the tool. For example, the use of tools that elongate the physical length of the arm induces kinematic changes affecting selectively the transport component of subsequent free-hand movements. Although mental simulation of an action is known to involve -to a large extent- the same processes as those at play in overt motor execution, whether tool-use imagery can yield similar effects on the body representation remains unknown. Mentally simulated actions indeed elicit autonomic physiological responses and follow motor execution rules that are comparable to those associated with the correspondent overt performance. Therefore, here we investigated the effects of the mental simulation of actions performed with a tool on the body representation by studying subsequent free-hand movements. Subjects executed reach to grasp movements with their hand before and after an imagery task performed with either a tool elongating their arm length or, as a control, with their hand alone. Two main results were found: First, in agreement with previous studies, durations of imagined movements performed with the tool and the hand were similarly affected by task difficulty. Second, kinematics of free-hand movements was affected after tool-use imagery, but not hand-use imagery, in a way similar to that previously documented after actual tool-use. These findings constitute the first evidence that tool-use imagery is sufficient to affect the representation of the user's arm.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Visuo-motor learning with combination of different rates of motor imagery and physical practice
    Allami, Nadia
    Paulignan, Yves
    Brovelli, Andrea
    Boussaoud, Driss
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 184 (01) : 105 - 113
  • [2] When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use
    Berti, A
    Frassinetti, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 (03) : 415 - 420
  • [3] THE TOOL AS THE LAST PIECE OF THE ATHLETE'S GESTURE IMAGERY PUZZLE
    Bisio, A.
    Avanzino, L.
    Ruggeri, P.
    Bove, M.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 265 : 196 - 203
  • [4] Body posture modulates imagined arm movements and responds to them
    Boulton, Hayley
    Mitra, Suvobrata
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 110 (11) : 2617 - 2626
  • [5] Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space
    Bourgeois, Jeremy
    Farne, Alessandro
    Coello, Yann
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 148 : 91 - 95
  • [6] Brozzoli Claudio, 2012, The Neural Bases of Multi-sensory Processes, P447
  • [7] Cacola P., 2013, J IMAGERY RES SPORT, V8, P55, DOI [10.1515/jirspa-2013-0003, DOI 10.1515/JIRSPA-2013-0003]
  • [8] When action is not enough: Tool-use reveals tactile-dependent access to Body Schema
    Cardinali, L.
    Brozzoli, C.
    Urquizar, C.
    Salemme, R.
    Roy, A. C.
    Farne, A.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (13) : 3750 - 3757
  • [9] Cardinali L., 2011, Tool Use and Causal Cognition, P202, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199571154.003.0011
  • [10] Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action
    Cardinali, Lucilla
    Jacobs, Stephane
    Brozzoli, Claudio
    Frassinetti, Francesca
    Roy, Alice C.
    Farne, Alessandro
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2012, 218 (02) : 259 - 271