Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation under different intensities

被引:8
|
作者
Yang, Ying [1 ]
Zhang, Yonge [2 ]
Jia, Guodong [1 ]
Wang, Ling [3 ]
Yu, Xinxiao [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Coll Water & Soil Conservat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water Cycle River, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Badaling Forest Farm, Beijing 102102, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Forestry Univ, Coll Water & soil Conservat, 35 Tsinghua East Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
Soil aggregation; Thinning intensity; Biotic factor; Soil microarthropods; Structural equation model; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI; ORGANIC-MATTER; CARBON; STABILITY; FOREST; PLANT; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108958
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Soil aggregation is a hierarchical and complex process mediated by both abiotic and biotic factors, and is crucial for preventing erosion.This study aimed to providing new insights into the role of biotic and abiotic factors on soil aggregation amid various thinning intensities and exploring mechanisms of aggregation. A survey involving four thinning treatments (T0: no thinning, T10: low-intensity thinning, T20: medium-intensity thinning, and T50: high-intensity thinning) of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation was conducted to explore mechanisms of soil aggre-gation and quantify the significance of selected biotic and abiotic factors effects on aggregation using structural equation models. Comprehensive models that included soil physicochemical properties, microbial community, root, and microarthropods were established. Compared to no-thinning, medium-intensity thinning contained about 1.8 times more mean weight diameter (MWD). The levels of total phospholipid fatty acids (totPLFAs), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), mycorrhizal colonization rate (F), and total microarthropods were signif-icantly higher in T20 than in other thinning treatments. The structural equation model indicated that the abiotic, biotic, and abiotic/biotic factors accounted for 35%, 82%, and 92% of the variation on MWD, respectively. MWD depended on the positive influence of F, totPLFAs, and AMF. Microorganisms were positively affected by total microarthropods and negatively affected by Diptera. Overall, the medium-intensity thinning (T20) was beneficial to the stability of soil aggregates. Also, biotic factors were more vital in determining soil aggregation than abiotic factors. Of note, soil microarthropods actd on aggregates by influencing microorganisms rather than directly affecting aggregation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contributions of biotic and abiotic factors to soil aggregation across a land use gradient
    Barto, E. Kathryn
    Alt, Fabian
    Oelmann, Yvonne
    Wilcke, Wolfgang
    Rillig, Matthias C.
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 42 (12): : 2316 - 2324
  • [2] Abiotic and Biotic Factors Influencing the Effect of Microplastic on Soil Aggregation
    Lehmann, Anika
    Fitschen, Katharina
    Rillig, Matthias C.
    SOIL SYSTEMS, 2019, 3 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [3] The regulatory effects of biotic and abiotic factors on soil respiration under different land-use types
    Xiao, H. B.
    Shi, Z. H.
    Li, Z. W.
    Chen, J.
    Huang, B.
    Yue, Z. J.
    Zhan, Y. M.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 127
  • [4] The regulatory effects of biotic and abiotic factors on soil respiration under different land-use types
    Xiao, H.B.
    Shi, Z.H.
    Li, Z.W.
    Chen, J.
    Huang, B.
    Yue, Z.J.
    Zhan, Y.M.
    Ecological Indicators, 2021, 127
  • [5] Soil respiration in response to biotic and abiotic factors under different mulching measures on rain-fed farmland
    Liu, Zihan
    Huang, Fangyuan
    Wang, Bingfan
    Li, Zhaoyang
    Zhao, Chenxu
    Ding, Ruixia
    Yang, Baoping
    Zhang, Peng
    Jia, Zhikuan
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2023, 232
  • [6] Influence of biotic and abiotic factors on dissipating metalaxyl in soil
    Sukul, P
    Spiteller, M
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2001, 45 (6-7) : 941 - 947
  • [7] Comparing the relative contributions of biotic and abiotic factors as mediators of species' distributions
    Gonzalez-Salazar, Constantino
    Stephens, Christopher R.
    Marquet, Pablo A.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2013, 248 : 57 - 70
  • [8] Biotic and abiotic factors associated with soil suppressiveness to Rhizodonia solani
    Ghini, R
    Morandi, MAB
    SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2006, 63 (02): : 153 - 160
  • [9] Soil persistence of triasulfuron herbicide as affected by biotic and abiotic factors
    Singh, Shashi B.
    Kulshrestha, Gita
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART B-PESTICIDES FOOD CONTAMINANTS AND AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 2006, 41 (05) : 635 - 645
  • [10] Influence of different abiotic and biotic factors on the metalaxyl and carbofuran dissipation
    Bermudez-Couso, Alipio
    Carlos Novoa-Munoz, Juan
    Arias-Estevez, Manuel
    Fernandez-Calvino, David
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2013, 90 (10) : 2526 - 2533