In-Plane Behavior of Confined Masonry Walls-With and Without Opening

被引:0
|
作者
Eshghi, Sassan
Pourazin, Khashaiar
机构
关键词
Confined Masonry; Bond-Beams; Tie-Columns; In-Plane Behavior; Capacity Curves; Interface Modeling; Macro Modeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Confined masonry buildings are used in rural and urban areas of Iran They performed almost satisfactory during past moderate earthquakes of Iran. There is not a methodology hi Iranian Seismic Code (Standard 2800-3rd edition) to estimate their capacities quantitatively. In line with removing this constraint, an attempt is made to study in-plane behavior of two squared confined masonry walls with mid without opening by; using a numerical approach. These walls are considered based on Iranian Seismic Code requirements. Finite element 2D models of the walls are developed and a pushover analysis is carried out. To model the non-linear behavior of the confined masonry! walls. the following criteria are used: (1) The Rankine-Hill yield criterion with low orthotropic factor to model the masonry panel: (2) The Rankine yield criterion to model reinforced concrete bond-beams and tie-columns: (3 Pie Coulomb friction criterion with tension cutoff mode to model the interface zone between the mansonry panel and reinforced concrete members. For this purpose. the unknown parameters are determined by testing of mosonry and concrete samples: and by finite element analysis. Comparing the results show that the initial stiffness, the maximum lateral strength and the ductility factor of walls with and without opening are different. Also, the severe compressed zones of the masonry panels within the confining elements are found different from what are reported for the mosonry panels of infilled frames by other researchers. This study shows that a further investigation is needed for estimating capacity of confined masonry walls with and without opening analytically and experimentally. Also where openings, with medium size are existed, the confining elements should be added around them. These issues can be considered in the next revisions of Iranian Seismic Code.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 60
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experimental Study of the In-Plane Behavior of Confined Stone Masonry Walls
    Ahmadizadeh, M.
    Shakib, H.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (02)
  • [2] Role of Toothing on In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Behavior of Confined Masonry Walls
    Singhal, Vaibhav
    Rai, Durgesh C.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 140 (09)
  • [3] Flexural Behavior of Confined Masonry Walls Subjected to In-Plane Lateral Loads
    Varela-Rivera, Jorge
    Fernandez-Baqueiro, Luis
    Gamboa-Villegas, Jose
    Prieto-Coyoc, Adda
    Moreno-Herrera, Joel
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2019, 35 (01) : 405 - 422
  • [4] Behavior of Confined Masonry Walls with Openings under In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Loads
    Singhal, Vaibhav
    Rai, Durgesh C.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2018, 34 (02) : 817 - 841
  • [5] In-plane behavior of perforated brick masonry walls
    Alessia Vanin
    Paolo Foraboschi
    Materials and Structures, 2012, 45 : 1019 - 1034
  • [6] In-plane behavior of perforated brick masonry walls
    Vanin, Alessia
    Foraboschi, Paolo
    MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2012, 45 (07) : 1019 - 1034
  • [7] Effect of flanges on the in-plane behavior of the masonry walls
    Patel, Kaushal P.
    Dubey, R. N.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 273
  • [8] In-Plane Shear Behavior of Traditional Masonry Walls
    Doran, Bilge
    Koksal, H. Orhun
    Aktan, Selen
    Ulukaya, Serhan
    Oktay, Didem
    Yuzer, Nabi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2017, 11 (02) : 278 - 291
  • [9] Cyclic in-plane behavior of unreinforced and confined masonry walls retrofitted by shotcrete: Experimental investigation
    Rezaee, Seyed Rahman Seyed
    Soltani, Masoud
    Nikooravesh, Morteza
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 264
  • [10] Use of GFRP as retrofit alternative for confined masonry walls with window opening subjected to in-plane lateral load
    Leal-Graciano, J. Martin
    Quinonez, Basilia
    Rodriguez-Lozoya, Hector E.
    Perez-Gavilan, Juan J.
    Lizarraga-Pereda, Jose F.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 223