Is Peer Review Censorship?

被引：19
|
作者：
Casadevall, Arturo
Fang, Ferric C.
机构：
来源：
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY | 2009年 / 77卷 / 04期
关键词：
SCIENCE; CHANCE;
D O I：
10.1128/IAI.00018-09
中图分类号：
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号：
100102 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：1273 / 1274
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Conducting Proper Peer Review for a Journal
    Allen, Thomas W.
    BARIATRIC SURGICAL PRACTICE AND PATIENT CARE, 2014, 9 (01) : 18 - 20
  • [22] Disagreement and Agonistic Chance in Peer Review
    Roumbanis, Lambros
    SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2022, 47 (06) : 1302 - 1333
  • [23] Gender differences in peer review of innovation
    Belz, Andrea P.
    Graddy-Reed, Alexandra
    Hanewicz, Isabel
    Terrile, Richard J.
    STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (02) : 255 - 280
  • [24] The Hawthorne effect in journal peer review
    Bornmann, Lutz
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 91 (03) : 857 - 862
  • [25] The multiple faces of journal peer review
    Thatje, Sven
    NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, 2010, 97 (03) : 237 - 239
  • [26] The Validation of Peer Review through Research Impact Measures and the Implications for Funding Strategies
    Gallo, Stephen A.
    Carpenter, Afton S.
    Irwin, David
    McPartland, Caitlin D.
    Travis, Joseph
    Reynders, Sofie
    Thompson, Lisa A.
    Glisson, Scott R.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [27] Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review
    Herron, Daniel M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (08): : 2275 - 2280
  • [28] Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: A scoping review
    Mahmic-Kaknjo, Mersiha
    Utrobicic, Ana
    Marusic, Ana
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2021, 28 (05): : 297 - 329
  • [29] Editorial Judgments: A Praxeology of 'Voting' in Peer Review
    Hirschauer, Stefan
    SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2010, 40 (01) : 71 - 103
  • [30] The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
    Morey, Richard D.
    Chambers, Christopher D.
    Etchells, Peter J.
    Harris, Christine R.
    Hoekstra, Rink
    Lakens, Daniel
    Lewandowsky, Stephan
    Morey, Candice Coker
    Newman, Daniel P.
    Schoenbrodt, Felix D.
    Vanpaemel, Wolf
    Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
    Zwaan, Rolf A.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2016, 3 (01):
12345