Analysis of tubular receivers for concentrating solar tower systems with a range of working fluids, in exergy-optimised flow-path configurations

被引:15
作者
Zheng, Meige [1 ]
Zapata, Jose [1 ]
Asselineau, Charles-Alexis [1 ]
Coventry, Joe [1 ]
Pye, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Elect Energy & Mat Engn, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Concentrating solar power (CSP); Heat transfer fluid; Exergy analysis; Receiver design; THERMAL-ENERGY STORAGE; HEAT-TRANSFER FLUIDS; LIQUID-METALS; SODIUM RECEIVER; PHASE-CHANGE; DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; TUBES; SALT;
D O I
10.1016/j.solener.2020.09.037
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Central tower concentrating solar power (CSP) systems typically focus solar radiation upon a tubular solar receiver where radiation is absorbed and then transferred, by conduction and convection, into a heat transfer fluid. In this paper, a range of heat transfer fluids are compared, using energy and exergy analysis, and varying the tube diameter, tube wall thickness, and tube-bank flow configuration. The model optimises exergy efficiency including pumping work, assuming uniform flux, and neglecting the effects of thermal stresses, circumferential tube temperature variations and cost. Suitable temperature and pressure conditions are chosen for each fluid, based on a realistic configuration of an applicable thermal energy storage (TES) and power block (PB). The examined heat transfer fluids are molten salt (60% NaNO3, 40% KNO3), liquid sodium, supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO(2)), air, and water/steam. Results showed that liquid sodium at an elevated (540-740 degrees C) temperature range performed best, with a solar-to-fluid exergy efficiency of 61%. At a low temperature range (290-565 degrees C), sodium was still marginally superior to molten salt, even after allowing for some exergy destruction in a sodium-to-salt heat exchanger. Water/steam also performs relatively well in the receiver, although the difficulties of integrating it with large-scale storage make it a challenging heat transfer fluid for an integrated system. Using sCO(2) as the heat transfer fluid appears infeasible due to excessively-high pressure stresses on the tubes. Air also appears unsuitable for simple tubular receivers, since poor heat internal transfer results in high losses due to much hotter external surfaces.
引用
收藏
页码:999 / 1016
页数:18
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [1] REVIEW OF SUPERCRITICAL CO2 POWER CYCLE TECHNOLOGY AND CURRENT STATUS OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    Ahn, Yoonhan
    Bae, Seong Jun
    Kim, Minseok
    Cho, Seong Kuk
    Baik, Seungjoon
    Lee, Jeong Ik
    Cha, Jae Eun
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 47 (06) : 647 - 661
  • [2] Allen KennethGuy., 2014, Rock bed thermal storage for concentrating solar power plants
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, MECH FLUIDS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, TERMODINAMICA
  • [5] Parabolic trough solar thermal power plant Noor I in Morocco
    Aqachmar, Zineb
    Allouhi, Amine
    Jamil, Abdelmajid
    Gagouch, Belgacem
    Kousksou, Tarik
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 178 : 572 - 584
  • [6] ASME, 2001, BOIL PRESS VESS CO D
  • [7] Asselineau C.-A., 2018, AIP C P
  • [8] Exergy analysis of the focal-plane flux distribution of solar-thermal concentrators
    Asselineau, Charles-Alexis
    Coventry, Joe
    Pye, John
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 222 : 1023 - 1032
  • [9] ASTRI, 2017, 1SRI002ASTRI
  • [10] 2ND LAW ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS OF SOLAR COLLECTOR SYSTEMS
    BEJAN, A
    KEARNEY, DW
    KREITH, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1981, 103 (01): : 23 - 28