Microbial electrochemical nutrient recovery in anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactors

被引:75
作者
Hou, Dianxun [1 ]
Lu, Lu [1 ]
Sun, Dongya [2 ]
Ge, Zheng [1 ]
Huang, Xia [2 ]
Cath, Tzahi Y. [3 ]
Ren, Zhiyong Jason [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO USA
[2] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Sch Environm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Golden, CO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Forward osmosis; Anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactor; Nutrient recovery; Microbial electrochemical technology; Dissolved methane; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; OSMOSIS-MEMBRANE; FUEL-CELLS; RESOURCE RECOVERY; ELECTROLYSIS CELL; PHYSICAL ASPECTS; PERFORMANCE; DESALINATION; MECHANISMS; PHOSPHORUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.034
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study demonstrates that by incorporating a microbial electrochemical unit into an anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactor (AnOMBR), the system addressed several challenges faced by traditional anaerobic membrane bioreactors and recovered biogas, nitrogen, and phosphorus while maintaining high effluent quality with low dissolved methane. The microbial recovery cell (MRC)-AnOMBR system showed excellent organic (>93%) and phosphorus removal (>99%) and maintained effluent COD below 20 mg/L. Furthermore, the reactor effectively recovered up to 65% Pai(4)(3-) and 45% NH4+ from the influent, which can be further improved if membranes with higher selectivity are used. Nutrients removal from bulk solution mitigated NH4+ penetration to the draw solution and reduced scaling potential caused by POI43-. The maximum methane yield was 0.19 L CH4/g COD, and low methane (<2.5 mL CH4/L) was detected in the effluent. Further improvement can be made by increasing charge efficiency for better nutrient and energy recovery. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 188
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes [J].
Achilli, Andrea ;
Cath, Tzahi Y. ;
Marchand, Eric A. ;
Childress, Amy E. .
DESALINATION, 2009, 239 (1-3) :10-21
[2]  
APHA, 1998, STAND ETH EX WAT WAS
[3]   Examining sludge production in bioelectrochemical systems treating domestic wastewater [J].
Brown, Robert Keith ;
Harnisch, Falk ;
Dockhorn, Thomas ;
Schroeder, Uwe .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 198 :913-917
[4]   Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments [J].
Cath, Tzahi Y. ;
Childress, Amy E. ;
Elimelech, Menachem .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 281 (1-2) :70-87
[5]   Performance of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor with forward osmosis membrane for low-strength wastewater treatment [J].
Chen, Lin ;
Gu, Yangshuo ;
Cao, Chuqing ;
Zhang, Jun ;
Ng, Jing-Wen ;
Tang, Chuyang .
WATER RESEARCH, 2014, 50 :114-123
[6]   Novel Self-driven Microbial Nutrient Recovery Cell with Simultaneous Wastewater Purification [J].
Chen, Xi ;
Sun, Dongya ;
Zhang, Xiaoyuan ;
Liang, Peng ;
Huang, Xia .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
[7]   Two-stage conversion of crude glycerol to energy using dark fermentation linked with microbial fuel cell or microbial electrolysis cell [J].
Chookaew, Teera ;
Prasertsan, Poonsuk ;
Ren, Zhiyong Jason .
NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 31 (02) :179-184
[8]   Indirect determination of zeta potential at high ionic strength: Specific application to semipermeable polymeric membranes [J].
Coday, Bryan D. ;
Luxbacher, Thomas ;
Childress, Amy E. ;
Almaraz, Nohemi ;
Xu, Pei ;
Cath, Tzahi Y. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2015, 478 :58-64
[9]   Rejection of Trace Organic Compounds by Forward Osmosis Membranes: A Literature Review [J].
Coday, Bryan D. ;
Yaffe, Bethany G. M. ;
Xu, Pei ;
Cath, Tzahi Y. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (07) :3612-3624
[10]  
Devia Y. P., 2015, Journal of Water Resource and Protection, V7, P730, DOI 10.4236/jwarp.2015.79060