A randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based support staff intervention to increase the rate of fecal occult blood test ordering

被引:29
|
作者
Thompson, NJ [1 ]
Boyko, EJ
Dominitz, JA
Belcher, DW
Chesebro, BB
Stephens, LM
Chapko, MK
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Community & Behav Hlth, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle Div, Epidemiol Res & Informat Ctr, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[3] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle Div, Med Serv, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[4] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle Div, Gastroenterol Sect, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[5] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle Div, Gen Internal Med Sect, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[6] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle Div, Hlth Serv Res & Dev Serv, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[7] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
allied health personnel; colorectal neoplasms; mass screening; occult blood; practice guidelines; preventive medicine; randomized controlled trials; reminder systems;
D O I
10.1006/pmed.1999.0624
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Colorectal cancer is the second most common fatal malignancy in the United States. Early detection using fecal occult blood tests has been shown to reduce mortality, but these tests are underutilized among those eligible for this screening, Attempts to increase use of fecal occult blood tests in eligible populations have focused on the provider, patient, or system, But none have examined whether a support-staff intervention is effective in achieving this aim. We therefore conducted a randomized controlled trial to test the impact of authorizing support staff to order fecal occult blood tests in a general internal medicine clinic organized into four teams. Methods. A total of 1,109 patients were included in the study, 545 of whom were in the two teams randomized to treatment, Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to evaluate the impact of the intervention. Results. The intervention resulted in significantly more fecal occult blood test ordering in the treatment group than in the control group for all patients (52% vs 15%, P < 0.001), Treatment fecal occult blood test cards were returned as frequently as the control cards for all patients (44% vs 48%, P = 0.571). Conclusion. Delegation of selected screening tasks to support staff can enhance patient access to preventive care. (C) 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 251
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A family planning clinic-based intervention to address reproductive coercion: a cluster randomized controlled trial
    Miller, Elizabeth
    Tancredi, Daniel J.
    Decker, Michele R.
    McCauley, Heather L.
    Jones, Kelley A.
    Anderson, Heather
    James, Lisa
    Silverman, Jay G.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (01) : 58 - 67
  • [2] Randomized Trial Comparing the Test Characteristics of Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test At Different Cut-Off Levels to Guaiac-Based Fecal Occult Blood Test
    Hol, Lieke
    Wilschut, Janneke
    van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
    van Vuuren, Anneke
    van der Valk, Hans
    Reijerink-Verheij, Jacqueline C.
    van der Togt-van Leeuwen, Alexandra C.
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    Habbema, J. D.
    van Leerdam, Monique
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (05) : A622 - A622
  • [3] Randomized trial of a clinic-based weight loss intervention in cancer survivors
    Justin C. Brown
    Rachel L. Yung
    Anita Gobbie-Hurder
    Laura Shockro
    Keelin O’Connor
    Nancy Campbell
    Jocelyn Kasper
    Erica L. Mayer
    Sara M. Tolaney
    Ann H. Partridge
    Jennifer A. Ligibel
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2018, 12 : 186 - 195
  • [4] A randomized trial of a clinic-based weight loss intervention in cancer survivors
    Yung, Rachel Lynn
    Giobbie-Hurder, Anita
    Shockro, Laura
    O'Connor, Keelin
    Campbell, Nancy
    Kasper, Jocelyn
    Overmoyer, Beth
    Mayer, Erica L.
    Tolaney, Sara M.
    Partridge, Ann H.
    Ligibel, Jennifer A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (03)
  • [5] Randomized trial of a clinic-based weight loss intervention in cancer survivors
    Brown, Justin C.
    Yung, Rachel L.
    Gobbie-Hurder, Anita
    Shockro, Laura
    O'Connor, Keelin
    Campbell, Nancy
    Kasper, Jocelyn
    Mayer, Erica L.
    Tolaney, Sara M.
    Partridge, Ann H.
    Ligibel, Jennifer A.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2018, 12 (02) : 186 - 195
  • [6] DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A CLINIC-BASED PROCEDURAL INTERVENTION TO ENHANCE EMBRYO DONATION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
    Zimon, A.
    Shepard, D. S.
    Prottas, J.
    Rooney, K. L.
    Sakkas, D.
    Oskowitz, S. P.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S96 - S96
  • [7] Randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based survivorship intervention following adjuvant therapy in breast cancer survivors
    Dawn L. Hershman
    Heather Greenlee
    Danielle Awad
    Kevin Kalinsky
    Matthew Maurer
    Grace Kranwinkel
    Lois Brafman
    Ramona Jayasena
    Wei-Yann Tsai
    Alfred I. Neugut
    Katherine D. Crew
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2013, 138 : 795 - 806
  • [8] Randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based survivorship intervention following adjuvant therapy in breast cancer survivors
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    Greenlee, Heather
    Awad, Danielle
    Kalinsky, Kevin
    Maurer, Matthew
    Kranwinkel, Grace
    Brafman, Lois
    Jayasena, Ramona
    Tsai, Wei-Yann
    Neugut, Alfred I.
    Crew, Katherine D.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 138 (03) : 795 - 806
  • [9] Randomized Controlled Trial of a Clinic-Based Intervention to Promote Healthy Beverage Consumption Among Latino Children
    Beck, Amy L.
    Fernandez, Alicia
    Rojina, Jenssy
    Cabana, Michael
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2017, 56 (09) : 838 - 844
  • [10] Compliance with fecal occult blood test screening among low-income medical outpatients: A randomized controlled trial using a videotaped intervention
    Friedman, LC
    Everett, TE
    Peterson, L
    Ogbonnaya, KI
    Mendizabal, V
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2001, 16 (02) : 85 - 88