The Evolution of Sustainability Measurement Research

被引:129
作者
Mura, Matteo [1 ]
Longo, Mariolina [1 ]
Micheli, Pietro [2 ]
Bolzani, Daniela [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Management, Via Terracini 28, I-40131 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Econ & Management Sci, Milan Via Necchi 5, I-20123 Milan, Italy
关键词
CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; STAKEHOLDER INFLUENCE; VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; CARBON FOOTPRINTS; CSR DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1111/ijmr.12179
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research in sustainability measurement has been growing at a very high pace over the past years, and it has explored a variety of issues, from sustainability disclosure to measurement in green supply chains, from the diffusion of environmental standards to the political use of sustainability metrics. This study is the first to report and discuss the results of a comprehensive review of the sustainability measurement literature. In particular, the authors adopt a wide conceptualization of the measurement process, and analyze data through a bibliometric method-bibliographic coupling. The results show that the literature is divided into eight distinct areas of inquiry and 12 sub-fields, some of which have expanded significantly over recent years, and others appear to be waning. Furthermore, the lack of a comprehensive view of sustainability measurement has led to the development of many separate communities, resulting in duplications of effort, incomplete framing of the problem, and the proposal of partial solutions. However, findings drawn in sustainability measurement research could inform current debates in performance measurement and management in three main ways: by emphasizing stakeholders' roles in the design, implementation and use of measures; by indicating ways to establish common measures and sharing data between organizations; and by adopting novel theoretical perspectives. Equally, future sustainability measurement studies could benefit from consideration of extant research on strategic performance measurement and on the behavioral effects of measurement practices.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 695
页数:35
相关论文
共 241 条
[1]   An integrated environmental and fairtrade labelling scheme for product supply chains [J].
Acquaye, Adolf A. ;
Yamoah, Fred A. ;
Feng, Kuishuang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2015, 164 :472-483
[2]   An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains [J].
Ahi, Payman ;
Searcy, Cory .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 86 :360-377
[3]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[4]   A Descriptive Analysis of Environmental Disclosure: A Longitudinal Study of French Companies [J].
Albertini, Elisabeth .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2014, 121 (02) :233-254
[5]   Fuzzy sustainability incentives in new product development An empirical exploration of sustainability challenges in manufacturing companies [J].
Alblas, A. A. ;
Peters, K. ;
Wortmann, J. C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (04) :513-545
[6]   Sustainability performance and assurance: Influence on reputation [J].
Alon A. ;
Vidovic M. .
Corporate Reputation Review, 2015, 18 (4) :337-352
[7]   APPROXIMATION AND REGIONAL AGGREGATION IN MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS FOR NATIONAL CARBON FOOTPRINT ACCOUNTING [J].
Andrew, Robbie ;
Peters, Glen P. ;
Lennox, James .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2009, 21 (03) :311-335
[8]   A review of methods contributing to the assessment of the environmental sustainability of industrial systems [J].
Angelakoglou, K. ;
Gaidajis, G. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 108 :725-747
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Connections
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE