Efficacy of MAVIG X-Ray Protective Drapes in Reducing Operator Radiation Dose in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:10
作者
McCutcheon, Keir [1 ,3 ]
Vanhaverbeke, Maarten [1 ]
Pauwels, Ruben [1 ]
Dabin, Jeremie [2 ]
Schoonjans, Werner [2 ]
Bennett, Johan [1 ,3 ]
Adriaenssens, Tom [1 ,3 ]
Dubois, Christophe [1 ,3 ]
Sinnaeve, Peter [1 ,3 ]
Desmet, Walter [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Belgian Nucl Res Ctr, Res Dosimetr Applicat, Mol, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
cardiac catheterization; cardiologists; percutaneous coronary intervention; radiation; risk; PELVIC LEAD SHIELD; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; IONIZING-RADIATION; THREEFOLD DECREASE; DOUBLE-EXPOSURE; REDUCTION; ACCESS; DETERMINANTS; INSIGHTS; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009627
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Interventional cardiologists are occupationally exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation. The MAVIG X-ray protective drape (MXPD) is a commercially available light weight, lead-free shield placed over the pelvic area of patients to minimize operator radiation dose. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of the MXPD during routine cardiac catheterization, including percutaneous coronary interventions. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized controlled study comparing operator radiation dose during cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (n=632) with or without pelvic MXPD. We measured operator radiation dose at 4 sites: left eye, chest, left ring finger, and right ring finger. The primary outcomes were the difference in first operator radiation dose (mu Sv) and relative dose of the first operator (radiation dose normalized for dose area product) at the level of the chest in the 2 groups. Results: The use of the MXPD was associated with a 50% reduction in operator radiation dose (median dose 30.5 [interquartile range, 23.0-39.7] mu Sv in no drape group versus 15.3 [interquartile range, 11.1-20.0] mu Sv in the drape group; P<0.001) and a 57% reduction in relative operator dose (P<0.001). The largest absolute reduction in dose was observed at the left finger (median left finger dose for the no drape group was 104.9 [75.7-137.4] mu Sv versus 41.9 [32.6-70.6] mu Sv in the drape group; P<0.001). Conclusions: The pelvic MXPD significantly reduces first operator radiation dose during routine cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04285944.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiation Protection With a Patient Lead Shield and a Novel, Nonlead Surgical Cap for Operators Performing Coronary Angiography or Intervention
    Alazzoni, Ashraf
    Gordon, Chris L.
    Syed, Jaffer
    Natarajan, Madhu K.
    Rokoss, Michael
    Schwalm, Jon-David
    Mehta, Shamir R.
    Sheth, Tej
    Valettas, Nicholas
    Velianou, James
    Pandie, Shaheen
    Al Khdair, Darar
    Tsang, Michael
    Meeks, Brandi
    Colbran, Kiersten
    Waller, Ed
    Lee, Shun Fu
    Marsden, Tamara
    Jolly, Sanjit S.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (08)
  • [2] Operators' radiation exposure reduction during cardiac catheterization using a removable shield
    Arrivi, Alessio
    Pucci, G.
    Vaudo, G.
    Bier, N.
    Bock, C.
    Casavecchia, M.
    Bazzucchi, M.
    Dominici, M.
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTION AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 35 (04) : 379 - 384
  • [3] Burns S, 2013, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V95A, P1307, DOI [10.2106/JBJS.L.00893, 10.2106/JBJS.L00893]
  • [4] Determinants of operator and patient radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: Insights from the RadiCure (RADIation reduction during cardiac catheterization using real-timE monitoring) trial
    Christopoulos, Georgios
    Papayannis, Aristotelis C.
    Alomar, Mohammed
    Christakopoulos, Georgios E.
    Kotsia, Anna
    Michael, Tesfaldet T.
    Rangan, Bavana V.
    Roesle, Michele
    Shorrock, Deborah
    Makke, Lorenza
    Maragkoudakis, Spyros
    Mohammad, Atif
    Sarode, Karan
    Chambers, Charles E.
    Banerjee, Subhash
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 88 (07) : 1046 - 1055
  • [5] Effect of protective devices on the radiation dose received by the brains of interventional cardiologists
    da Silva, Edilaine Honorio
    Vanhavere, Filip
    Struelens, Lara
    Covens, Peter
    Buls, Nico
    [J]. EUROINTERVENTION, 2018, 13 (15) : 1778 - 1784
  • [6] EXTREMITY AND EYE LENS DOSES IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY AND CARDIOLOGY PROCEDURES: FIRST RESULTS OF THE ORAMED PROJECT
    Domienik, J.
    Brodecki, M.
    Carinou, E.
    Donadille, L.
    Jankowski, J.
    Koukorava, C.
    Krim, S.
    Nikodemova, D.
    Ruiz-Lopez, N.
    Sans-Merce, M.
    Struelens, L.
    Vanhavere, F.
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2011, 144 (1-4) : 442 - 447
  • [7] A New Design of a Lead-Acrylic Shield for Staff Dose Reduction in Radial and Femoral Access Coronary Catheterization
    Eder, H.
    Seidenbusch, M. C.
    Treitl, M.
    Gilligan, P.
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2015, 187 (10): : 915 - 923
  • [8] Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Medical Imaging Procedures.
    Fazel, Reza
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Wang, Yongfei
    Ross, Joseph S.
    Chen, Jersey
    Ting, Henry H.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Nasir, Khurram
    Einstein, Andrew J.
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (09) : 849 - 857
  • [9] Head and Neck Radiation Dose and Radiation Safety for Interventional Physicians
    Fetterly, Kenneth
    Schueler, Beth
    Grams, Michael
    Sturchio, Glenn
    Bell, Malcolm
    Gulati, Rajiv
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (05) : 520 - 528
  • [10] Effective Use of Radiation Shields to Minimize Operator Dose During Invasive Cardiology Procedures
    Fetterly, Kenneth A.
    Magnuson, Dixon J.
    Tannahill, Gordon M.
    Hindal, Mark D.
    Mathew, Verghese
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 4 (10) : 1133 - 1139