Assessment of CO2 capture options from various points in steam methane reforming for hydrogen production

被引:151
作者
Soltani, R. [1 ]
Rosen, M. A. [1 ]
Dincer, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
关键词
Steam methane reforming; Hydrogen production; CO2; emission; capture; Oxygen enrichment; GAS; PSA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.09.161
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Steam methane reforming (SMR) is currently the main hydrogen production process in industry, but it has high emissions of CO2, at almost 7 kg CO2/kg H-2 on average, and is responsible for about 3% of global industrial sector CO2 emissions. Here, the results are reported of an investigation of the effect of steam-to-carbon ratio (SIC) on CO2 capture criteria from various locations in the process, i.e. synthesis gas stream (location 1), pressure swing adsorber (PSA) tail gas (location 2), and furnace flue gases (location 3). The CO2 capture criteria considered in this study are CO2 partial pressure, CO2 concentration, and CO2 mass ratio compared to the final exhaust stream, which is furnace flue gases. The CO2 capture number (N-cc) is proposed as measure of capture favourability, defined as the product of the three above capture criteria. A weighting of unity is used for each criterion. The best S/C ratio, in terms of providing better capture option, is determined. CO2 removal from synthesis gas after the shift unit is found to be the best location for CO2 capture due to its high partial pressure of CO2. However, furnace flue gases, containing almost 50% of the CO2 in produced in the process, are of great significance environmentally. Consequently, the effects of oxygen enrichment of the furnace feed are investigated, and it is found that this measure improves the CO2 capture conditions for lower S/C ratios. Consequently, for an S/C ratio of 2.5, CO2 capture from a flue gas stream is competitive with two other locations provided higher weighting factors are considered for the full presence of CO2 in the flue gases stream. Considering carbon removal from flue gases, the ratio of hydrogen production rate and Ncc increases with rising reformer temperature. Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:20266 / 20275
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Economic assessment of membrane-assisted autothermal reforming for cost effective hydrogen production with CO2 capture [J].
Cloete, Schalk ;
Khan, Mohammed N. ;
Amini, Shahriar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (07) :3492-3510
[32]   Sorption enhanced reforming of methane combined with an iron oxide chemical loop for the production of hydrogen with CO2 capture: Conceptual design and operation strategy [J].
Fernandez, Jose R. ;
Carlos Abanades, J. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 125 :811-822
[33]   Modeling of sorption enhanced steam methane reforming in an adiabatic packed bed reactor using various CO2 sorbents [J].
Shahid, M. Mateen ;
Abbas, Syed Zaheer ;
Maqbool, Fahad ;
Ramirez-Solis, Sergio ;
Dupont, Valerie ;
Mahmud, Tariq .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (05)
[34]   Review of steam methane reforming as a method of hydrogen production [J].
Szablowski, Lukasz ;
Wojcik, Malgorzata ;
Dybinski, Olaf .
ENERGY, 2025, 316
[35]   Catalytic performances of Ni-CaO-mayenite in CO2 sorption enhanced steam methane reforming [J].
Cesario, Moises R. ;
Barros, Braulio S. ;
Courson, Claire ;
Melo, Dulce M. A. ;
Kiennemann, Alain .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 131 :247-253
[36]   Modeling of Laboratory Steam Methane Reforming and CO2 Methanation Reactors [J].
Costamagna, Paola ;
Pugliese, Federico ;
Cavattoni, Tullio ;
Busca, Guido ;
Garbarino, Gabriella .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (10)
[37]   Novel Adsorption Process for Co-Production of Hydrogen and CO2 from a Multicomponent Stream-Part 2: Application to Steam Methane Reforming and Autothermal Reforming Gases [J].
Streb, Anne ;
Mazzotti, Marco .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2020, 59 (21) :10093-10109
[38]   Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydrogen Production Processes: Turquoise Hydrogen vs. Steam Methane Reforming [J].
Ingale, Gayatri Udaysinh ;
Kwon, Hyun-Min ;
Jeong, Soohwa ;
Park, Dongho ;
Kim, Whidong ;
Bang, Byeingryeol ;
Lim, Young-Il ;
Kim, Sung Won ;
Kang, Youn-Bae ;
Mun, Jungsoo ;
Jun, Sunwoo ;
Lee, Uendo .
ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (22)
[39]   Utilization of CO2 arising from methane steam reforming reaction: Use of CO2 membrane and heterotic reactors [J].
Lee, Sunggeun ;
Lim, Hankwon .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2020, 91 :201-212
[40]   Hydrogen production from coal gasification for effective downstream CO2 capture [J].
Gnanapragasam, Nirmal V. ;
Reddy, Bale V. ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (10) :4933-4943