Does fairness matter in corporate takeovers?

被引:4
作者
Kristensen, H
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Psychol, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Lund, Dept Business Adm, Sch Econ & Management, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
fairness; mergers; acquisition; negotiation; price;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-4870(99)00035-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In interviews with the two head negotiators for a buying and a selling company in a Swedish takeover, a fair price was found to play an important role. A stated reason was that the companies wanted to do business in the future. To further test the importance of fairness, 88 graduate students of business administration playing the role of buyers were asked to evaluate selling prices in fictitious corporate takeovers. The results showed that both satisfaction with the offered selling prices and willingness to buy were affected by information about a fair price. Furthermore, the possibility of doing business in the future appeared to have some importance for this effect. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PsycINFO classification. 2340 JEL classification: C70; C91; G3.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 56
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, COORDINATION ACTION
[2]  
Biel A., 1996, FRONTIERS SOCIAL DIL, P57
[3]   NEGOTIATION AND MEDIATION [J].
CARNEVALE, PJ ;
PRUITT, DG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 43 :531-582
[4]  
COHEN RL, 1991, RES NEGOTIATION ORG, V3, P259
[5]   EQUITY, EQUALITY, AND NEED - WHAT DETERMINES WHICH VALUE WILL BE USED AS BASIS OF DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE [J].
DEUTSCH, M .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1975, 31 (03) :137-149
[6]  
DONALDSON G, 1963, HARVARD BUSINESS MAY
[7]   CONJECTURES ON COGNITIVE SIMPLIFICATION IN ACQUISITION AND DIVESTMENT DECISION-MAKING [J].
DUHAIME, IM ;
SCHWENK, CR .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1985, 10 (02) :287-295
[8]  
FIRTH M, 1991, MANAGERIAL DECISIONS, V12, P412
[9]  
Fisher R., 2011, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
[10]   WHATS FAIR - IT DEPENDS ON HOW YOU PHRASE THE QUESTION [J].
HARRIS, RJ ;
JOYCE, MA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 38 (01) :165-179