A Scoping Review of Published Research on the Relinquishment of Companion Animals

被引:105
作者
Coe, Jason B. [1 ]
Young, Ian [1 ]
Lambert, Kim [1 ]
Dysart, Laura [1 ]
Borden, Lea Nogueira [1 ]
Rajic, Andrijana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Populat Med, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
companion-animal relinquishment; companion-animal surrender; companion animals; scoping review; META-ANALYSIS; DOGS; INTERVENTIONS; PERSPECTIVES; PREVALENCE; SHELTERS; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1080/10888705.2014.899910
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Globally, large populations of companion animals are relinquished each year. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify all published research investigating companion-animal relinquishment to map out and evaluate research gaps, needs, and opportunities. A comprehensive search strategy was implemented in 4 online databases, identified citations were screened, and relevant articles were procured and characterized. From 6,848 unique citations identified, 192 were confirmed relevant, including 115 primary-research articles and 77 reviews and commentaries. The majority of these articles originated from the United States (131; 68.2%); 74 (38.5%) of them have been published since 2006. Among the primary-research articles, 84 (73.0%) investigated reasons for companion-animal relinquishment. The most commonly studied reasons were aggressive companion-animal behaviors (49; 58.3%); moving, rental, or housing issues (45; 53.6%); and caretaker personal issues (42; 50.0%). Only 17 primary-research articles investigated interventions to prevent companion-animal relinquishment. The quantity of research into reasons for relinquishment highlights an opportunity for future knowledge-synthesis activities in this area, including systematic review and meta-analysis. In comparison, the limited research into interventions identifies a priority for new research.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 273
页数:21
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, P INT C EV ASS SOFTW
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, US PET OWN DEM SOURC
  • [3] Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
  • [4] AVANZINO R, 1991, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V198, P1237
  • [5] The Benefits of Human-Companion Animal Interaction: A Review
    Barker, Sandra B.
    Wolen, Aaron R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 35 (04) : 487 - 495
  • [6] Behavioral evaluation and demographic information in the assessment of aggressiveness in shelter dogs
    Bollen, Kelley S.
    Horowitz, Joseph
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2008, 112 (1-2) : 120 - 135
  • [7] A systematic review-meta-analysis of chilling interventions and a meta-regression of various processing interventions for Salmonella contamination of chicken
    Bucher, Oliver
    Farrar, Ashley M.
    Totton, Sarah C.
    Wilkins, Wendy
    Waddell, Lisa A.
    Wilhelm, Barbara J.
    McEwen, Scott A.
    Fazil, Aamir
    Rajic, Andrijana
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2012, 103 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [8] Canadian Federation of Humane Societies, 2010, AN SHELT STAT
  • [9] ASAS CENTENNIAL PAPER: Perspectives on domestication: The history of our relationship with man's best friend
    Case, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2008, 86 (11) : 3245 - 3251
  • [10] What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature
    Davis, Kathy
    Drey, Nick
    Gould, Dinah
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2009, 46 (10) : 1386 - 1400