Restrictions, Power, Companionship, and Intimacy: A Metasynthesis of People With Intellectual Disability Speaking About Sex and Relationships

被引:26
作者
Black, Rhonda S. [1 ]
Kammes, Rebecca R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
intellectual disability; sexuality; interpersonal relationships; intimate relationships; qualitative research; ABUSE PREVENTION SKILLS; DEVELOPMENTAL-DISABILITIES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; LEARNING-DISABILITIES; INCLUSIVE RESEARCH; MARITAL QUALITY; DATING PROGRAM; YOUNG-PEOPLE; SEXUALITY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1352/1934-9556-57.3.212
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Examining literature that tells us what people with intellectual disability (PWID) think and feel about their sexual lives may enable families and professionals to offer a more person-centered approach to education and support. Examining the voices of many individuals across several studies may provide more convincing evidence about the experiences of these individuals-turning a solo into a chorus. Thus, the purpose of this article is to describe the results of a metasynthesis of qualitative studies highlighting the voices of PWID with respect to relationships and sexuality. Combining the results of 16 qualitative studies, 271 participants with intellectual disability were interviewed individually or in focus groups about their feelings and experiences regarding intimate relationships. Studies were conducted across Europe, in Australia, China, and in the United States. A little more than half of the participants were male; ages ranged from 13 to 89. Results revealed two competing themes of control and desire. Participants across studies desired friendships and close interpersonal relationships, yet were restricted from developing these relationships by policies, program staff, and family members.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 233
页数:22
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The sexual assault epidemic no one talks about.
[2]   Sociology and Science: The Making of a Social Scientific Method [J].
Au, Anson .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGIST, 2018, 49 (01) :98-115
[3]   Constructing sexual identities: people with intellectual disability talking about sexuality [J].
Azzopardi-Lane, Claire ;
Callus, Anne-Marie .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2015, 43 (01) :32-37
[4]   Social Baseline Theory: The Role of Social Proximity in Emotion and Economy of Action [J].
Beckes, Lane ;
Coan, James A. .
SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2011, 5 (12) :976-988
[5]  
Berman H, 1999, Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs, V22, P183
[6]   Women with intellectual disabilities talk about their perceptions of sex [J].
Bernert, D. J. ;
Ogletree, R. J. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2013, 57 (03) :240-249
[7]   Sexuality and Disability in the Lives of Women with Intellectual Disabilities [J].
Bernert, Donna J. .
SEXUALITY AND DISABILITY, 2011, 29 (02) :129-141
[8]   Conceptualizing Inclusive Research with People with Intellectual Disability [J].
Bigby, Christine ;
Frawley, Patsie ;
Ramcharan, Paul .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 27 (01) :3-12
[9]  
Black R. S., 2013, MENTAL HLTH WELLNESS, P83
[10]   Dyadic interviewing: a technique valuing interdependence in interviews with individuals with intellectual disabilities [J].
Caldwell, Kate .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (04) :488-507