"The Innovation Imperative": The Struggle Over Agroecology in the International Food Policy Arena

被引:38
作者
Anderson, Colin R. [1 ]
Maughan, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Coventry Univ, Ctr Agroecol Water & Resilience, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
agroecology; innovation; food policy; agricultural policy; technology; critical discourse analysis; FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization); SOCIAL INNOVATION; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNANCE; SYSTEMS; POWER;
D O I
10.3389/fsufs.2021.619185
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
As the gravity of the global social and ecological crises become more apparent, there is a growing recognition of the need for social transformation. In this article, we use a combination of narrative case study and discourse analysis to better understand how transformative concepts, such as agroecology, are shaped as they as they enter mainstream discursive arenas. We probe the different characteristics of the "innovation frame" and how they qualify and give meaning to agroecology. Our case study narrates the recent emergence of agroecology in the UN space and its relationship to the discursive frame of innovation. We then undertake a systematic discourse analysis of comments provided in an online consultation process on the "Agroecology and Other Innovations" report by the 2019 High-Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) in the World Committee on Food Security. We examine how different actors positioned themselves vis-a-vis the innovation frame and we analyse the discursive strategies used to advance particular political agendas. Our analysis reveals three primary sub-frames within the innovation frame (Evidence; Technology; Rights) which were deployed by both proponents and detractors of agroecology. We focus on the notion of social agency, and its different presentations, within the three sub-frames which raises a number of problematics of the innovation frame, not only for agroecology, but for sustainability transformations more widely.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 72 条
[11]   Divergent understandings of agroecology in the era of the African Green Revolution [J].
Bellwood-Howard, Imogen ;
Ripoll, Santiago .
OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2020, 49 (02) :103-110
[12]   How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods [J].
Berthet, Elsa T. A. ;
Barnaud, Cecile ;
Girard, Nathalie ;
Labatut, Julie ;
Martin, Guillaume .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 59 (02) :280-301
[13]  
Brand Stewart., 2010, Whole Earth Discipline: Why Dense Cities, Nuclear Power, Transgenic Crops, Restored Wildlands and Geoengineering Are Necessary
[14]  
Civil Society Mechanism for relations to the Committee on World Food Security (CSM), 2020, ZERO DRAFT POLICY RE
[15]  
Committee on World Food Security, 2020, ZERO DRAFT POLICY RE
[16]  
Conrow J., 2020, AGROECOLOGY MUST BE
[17]  
de Molina M., 2019, Political Agroecology: Advancing the Transition to Sustainable Food Systems, V1st
[18]   Toward thick legitimacy: Creating a web of legitimacy for agroecology [J].
de Wit, Maywa Montenegro ;
Iles, Alastair .
ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE, 2016, 4
[19]  
El Bilali H, 2018, ITAL J FOOD SCI, V30, P200, DOI 10.14674/IJFS-1096
[20]   Innovation-Sustainability Nexus in Agriculture Transition: Case of Agroecology [J].
El Bilali, Hamid .
OPEN AGRICULTURE, 2019, 4 (01) :1-16