"The Innovation Imperative": The Struggle Over Agroecology in the International Food Policy Arena

被引:38
作者
Anderson, Colin R. [1 ]
Maughan, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Coventry Univ, Ctr Agroecol Water & Resilience, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
agroecology; innovation; food policy; agricultural policy; technology; critical discourse analysis; FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization); SOCIAL INNOVATION; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNANCE; SYSTEMS; POWER;
D O I
10.3389/fsufs.2021.619185
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
As the gravity of the global social and ecological crises become more apparent, there is a growing recognition of the need for social transformation. In this article, we use a combination of narrative case study and discourse analysis to better understand how transformative concepts, such as agroecology, are shaped as they as they enter mainstream discursive arenas. We probe the different characteristics of the "innovation frame" and how they qualify and give meaning to agroecology. Our case study narrates the recent emergence of agroecology in the UN space and its relationship to the discursive frame of innovation. We then undertake a systematic discourse analysis of comments provided in an online consultation process on the "Agroecology and Other Innovations" report by the 2019 High-Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) in the World Committee on Food Security. We examine how different actors positioned themselves vis-a-vis the innovation frame and we analyse the discursive strategies used to advance particular political agendas. Our analysis reveals three primary sub-frames within the innovation frame (Evidence; Technology; Rights) which were deployed by both proponents and detractors of agroecology. We focus on the notion of social agency, and its different presentations, within the three sub-frames which raises a number of problematics of the innovation frame, not only for agroecology, but for sustainability transformations more widely.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Agroecology Working Group of the Civil Society Mechanism of the UN Committee on Food Security, 2019, WORLDWIDE CIVIL SOC
[2]   Agroecology now-connecting the dots to enable agroecology transformations [J].
Anderson, C. R. ;
Pimbert, M. P. ;
Chappell, M. J. ;
Brem-Wilson, J. ;
Claeys, P. ;
Kiss, C. ;
Maughan, C. ;
Milgroom, J. ;
McAllister, G. ;
Moeller, N. ;
Singh, J. .
AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2020, 44 (05) :561-565
[3]   From Transition to Domains of Transformation: Getting to Sustainable and Just Food Systems through Agroecology [J].
Anderson, Colin Ray ;
Bruil, Janneke ;
Chappell, Michael Jahi ;
Kiss, Csilla ;
Pimbert, Michel Patrick .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)
[4]  
Anderson ColinR., 2020, Agroecology Now!: Transformations Towards More Just and Sustainable Food Systems
[5]  
Anderson M., 2020, TRANSFORMATION OUR F, P33
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Catalysing dialogue and cooperation to scale up agroecology: Outcomes of the FAO regional seminars on agroecology
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CRITICAL DISCOURSE A, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-08748-210341
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. A Report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security
[9]   Social innovation and the governance of sustainable places [J].
Baker, Susan ;
Mehmood, Abid .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 20 (03) :321-334
[10]  
BARRETT H, 2021, SOCIOLOGY, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/SORU.12324